From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:08:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545C9A1B.6020905@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415201733.958.121.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 2014/11/5 23:35, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:58 +0200, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since
>> ubi_device structure is not used by it.
>>
>> Amended a bit by Artem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
>
> Oh, the entire patch-set again... this means we need to review it again!
> Please, have a mercy! :-) It is huge! Please, send a small patch against
> the one which I pushed already. Thanks!
>
That means I can't add a Reviewed-by on this huge one...
What a pity~! ^.^
> Artem.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:08:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545C9A1B.6020905@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415201733.958.121.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 2014/11/5 23:35, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:58 +0200, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since
>> ubi_device structure is not used by it.
>>
>> Amended a bit by Artem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
>
> Oh, the entire patch-set again... this means we need to review it again!
> Please, have a mercy! :-) It is huge! Please, send a small patch against
> the one which I pushed already. Thanks!
>
That means I can't add a Reviewed-by on this huge one...
What a pity~! ^.^
> Artem.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:08:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545C9A1B.6020905@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415201733.958.121.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 2014/11/5 23:35, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:58 +0200, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since
>> ubi_device structure is not used by it.
>>
>> Amended a bit by Artem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
>
> Oh, the entire patch-set again... this means we need to review it again!
> Please, have a mercy! :-) It is huge! Please, send a small patch against
> the one which I pushed already. Thanks!
>
That means I can't add a Reviewed-by on this huge one...
What a pity~! ^.^
> Artem.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 13:58 [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-03 13:58 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-03 13:58 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-05 15:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-05 15:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-07 10:08 ` hujianyang [this message]
2014-11-07 10:08 ` hujianyang
2014-11-07 10:08 ` hujianyang
2014-11-07 12:32 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-10 17:37 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-10 17:37 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-10 17:57 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-10 17:57 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-11 8:24 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-11 8:24 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-11 8:34 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-11 8:34 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-11 8:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 8:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 9:53 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-11-11 11:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 11:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 11:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 8:15 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 8:15 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 12:03 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 12:03 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 12:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 12:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 13:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 13:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-11 19:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-11 19:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-12 12:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-12 12:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-12-29 3:14 ` hujianyang
2014-12-29 3:14 ` hujianyang
2014-12-29 3:14 ` hujianyang
2014-12-29 14:15 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-12-29 14:15 ` Tanya Brokhman
2014-12-30 1:27 ` hujianyang
2014-12-30 1:27 ` hujianyang
2014-12-30 1:27 ` hujianyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545C9A1B.6020905@huawei.com \
--to=hujianyang@huawei.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tlinder@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.