From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff relate
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:46:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5464C444.4050101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5464C026.7030300@ti.com>
Hi,
On 11/13/2014 03:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 13/11/14 15:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> +chosen {
>> + framebuffer0: framebuffer@5fc00000 {
>> compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
>> - reg = <0x1d385000 (1600 * 1200 * 2)>;
>> + reg = <0x5fc00000 (4096 * 1024)>;
>
> Was there a reason for this change?
I changed the node name to match the new bindings text which
specifies that the node name must be framebuffer@<address>,
while at it I've taken a real world address range.
I assume you refer to the bit where the size of the reg property
is changed ? That indeed is not really necessary.
Regards,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5464C444.4050101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5464C026.7030300@ti.com>
Hi,
On 11/13/2014 03:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 13/11/14 15:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> +chosen {
>> + framebuffer0: framebuffer at 5fc00000 {
>> compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
>> - reg = <0x1d385000 (1600 * 1200 * 2)>;
>> + reg = <0x5fc00000 (4096 * 1024)>;
>
> Was there a reason for this change?
I changed the node name to match the new bindings text which
specifies that the node name must be framebuffer@<address>,
while at it I've taken a real world address range.
I assume you refer to the bit where the size of the reg property
is changed ? That indeed is not really necessary.
Regards,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Luc Verhaegen <libv-AgBVmzD5pcezQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
David Herrmann
<dh.herrmann-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5464C444.4050101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5464C026.7030300-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 11/13/2014 03:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 13/11/14 15:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> +chosen {
>> + framebuffer0: framebuffer@5fc00000 {
>> compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
>> - reg = <0x1d385000 (1600 * 1200 * 2)>;
>> + reg = <0x5fc00000 (4096 * 1024)>;
>
> Was there a reason for this change?
I changed the node name to match the new bindings text which
specifies that the node name must be framebuffer@<address>,
while at it I've taken a real world address range.
I assume you refer to the bit where the size of the reg property
is changed ? That indeed is not really necessary.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 13:34 [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] simplefb: Add support for enumerating simplefb dt nodes in /chosen Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] simplefb: Change simplefb_init from module_init to fs_initcall Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 14:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:47 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 14:47 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 14:47 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] fbcon: Change fbcon_init " Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 13:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 14:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 14:46 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-11-13 14:46 ` Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 14:46 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2014-11-13 15:52 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff relate Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 15:52 ` Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 15:52 ` [linux-sunxi] " Tomi Valkeinen
2014-11-13 16:07 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff relate Grant Likely
2014-11-13 16:07 ` Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties Grant Likely
2014-11-13 16:07 ` [linux-sunxi] " Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5464C444.4050101@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.