* Busybox sh link
@ 2014-11-17 14:07 Stefan Eichenberger
2014-11-18 3:07 ` ChenQi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Eichenberger @ 2014-11-17 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qi.Chen@windriver.com, yocto@yoctoproject.org
Hello all
I have a question regarding busybox and sh. If I want to install bash together with busybox ash, yocto does not consider the ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY in each case (e.g. if bash is installed before busybox). The problem is that do_install of busybox creates a link to busybox.nosuid. Is there a reason for that? Shouldn't update-alternatives create that link for us? There is already a patch available that targets this problem (467b19efbaa9c0cb04d2665e8cd9a0919849a5ed ) but it only works if ash is completely disabled in the busybox config.
So the main question is, wouldn't it be possible to remove this lines completely?
Regards,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Busybox sh link
2014-11-17 14:07 Busybox sh link Stefan Eichenberger
@ 2014-11-18 3:07 ` ChenQi
2014-11-18 16:34 ` Stefan Eichenberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: ChenQi @ 2014-11-18 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Eichenberger, yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11/17/2014 10:07 PM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I have a question regarding busybox and sh. If I want to install bash together with busybox ash, yocto does not consider the ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY in each case (e.g. if bash is installed before busybox). The problem is that do_install of busybox creates a link to busybox.nosuid. Is there a reason for that? Shouldn't update-alternatives create that link for us? There is already a patch available that targets this problem (467b19efbaa9c0cb04d2665e8cd9a0919849a5ed ) but it only works if ash is completely disabled in the busybox config.
>
> So the main question is, wouldn't it be possible to remove this lines completely?
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
>
>
I can confirm that this is indeed a problem. And we need to fix this.
I think the reason for this line is mainly to make 'busybox' provide
'/bin/sh' so that do_rootfs would succeed.
Regards,
Chen Qi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Busybox sh link
2014-11-18 3:07 ` ChenQi
@ 2014-11-18 16:34 ` Stefan Eichenberger
2014-11-19 6:00 ` ChenQi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Eichenberger @ 2014-11-18 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ChenQi, yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11/18/2014 04:07 AM, ChenQi wrote:
> On 11/17/2014 10:07 PM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> I have a question regarding busybox and sh. If I want to install bash
>> together with busybox ash, yocto does not consider the
>> ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY in each case (e.g. if bash is installed before
>> busybox). The problem is that do_install of busybox creates a link to
>> busybox.nosuid. Is there a reason for that? Shouldn't
>> update-alternatives create that link for us? There is already a patch
>> available that targets this problem
>> (467b19efbaa9c0cb04d2665e8cd9a0919849a5ed ) but it only works if ash
>> is completely disabled in the busybox config.
>>
>> So the main question is, wouldn't it be possible to remove this lines
>> completely?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>
> I can confirm that this is indeed a problem. And we need to fix this.
> I think the reason for this line is mainly to make 'busybox' provide
> '/bin/sh' so that do_rootfs would succeed.
>
> Regards,
> Chen Qi
Probably I miss something but I don't understand why do_rootfs fails if
the link is not provided? Isn't the link created anyhow during package
installation in the postinstall script with update-alternatives if
necessary?
For testing I removed the link creation temporary from the recipe and
built the core-image-minimal for qemux86, it was creating the link
correctly in this case.
Regards,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Busybox sh link
2014-11-18 16:34 ` Stefan Eichenberger
@ 2014-11-19 6:00 ` ChenQi
2014-11-19 9:08 ` Stefan Eichenberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: ChenQi @ 2014-11-19 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Eichenberger, yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11/19/2014 12:34 AM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 04:07 AM, ChenQi wrote:
>> On 11/17/2014 10:07 PM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
>>> Hello all
>>>
>>> I have a question regarding busybox and sh. If I want to install
>>> bash together with busybox ash, yocto does not consider the
>>> ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY in each case (e.g. if bash is installed before
>>> busybox). The problem is that do_install of busybox creates a link
>>> to busybox.nosuid. Is there a reason for that? Shouldn't
>>> update-alternatives create that link for us? There is already a
>>> patch available that targets this problem
>>> (467b19efbaa9c0cb04d2665e8cd9a0919849a5ed ) but it only works if ash
>>> is completely disabled in the busybox config.
>>>
>>> So the main question is, wouldn't it be possible to remove this
>>> lines completely?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I can confirm that this is indeed a problem. And we need to fix this.
>> I think the reason for this line is mainly to make 'busybox' provide
>> '/bin/sh' so that do_rootfs would succeed.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chen Qi
>
> Probably I miss something but I don't understand why do_rootfs fails
> if the link is not provided? Isn't the link created anyhow during
> package installation in the postinstall script with
> update-alternatives if necessary?
>
> For testing I removed the link creation temporary from the recipe and
> built the core-image-minimal for qemux86, it was creating the link
> correctly in this case.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
>
>
Hi Stefan,
I did some testing, and could not reproduce the problem.
I then realized that as the sh link is managed by ALTERNATIVES
mechanism, it will always point to bash instead of busybox.
I tested it by the following steps:
1. build core-image-minimal with bash installed
2. reinstall bash
3. reinstall busybox
So I think the current code is right.
I'm not sure if I missed something. If so, could you please provide more
information?
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Busybox sh link
2014-11-19 6:00 ` ChenQi
@ 2014-11-19 9:08 ` Stefan Eichenberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Eichenberger @ 2014-11-19 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ChenQi, yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11/19/2014 07:00 AM, ChenQi wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 12:34 AM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
>> On 11/18/2014 04:07 AM, ChenQi wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2014 10:07 PM, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
>>>> Hello all
>>>>
>>>> I have a question regarding busybox and sh. If I want to install
>>>> bash together with busybox ash, yocto does not consider the
>>>> ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY in each case (e.g. if bash is installed before
>>>> busybox). The problem is that do_install of busybox creates a link
>>>> to busybox.nosuid. Is there a reason for that? Shouldn't
>>>> update-alternatives create that link for us? There is already a
>>>> patch available that targets this problem
>>>> (467b19efbaa9c0cb04d2665e8cd9a0919849a5ed ) but it only works if
>>>> ash is completely disabled in the busybox config.
>>>>
>>>> So the main question is, wouldn't it be possible to remove this
>>>> lines completely?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can confirm that this is indeed a problem. And we need to fix this.
>>> I think the reason for this line is mainly to make 'busybox' provide
>>> '/bin/sh' so that do_rootfs would succeed.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chen Qi
>>
>> Probably I miss something but I don't understand why do_rootfs fails
>> if the link is not provided? Isn't the link created anyhow during
>> package installation in the postinstall script with
>> update-alternatives if necessary?
>>
>> For testing I removed the link creation temporary from the recipe and
>> built the core-image-minimal for qemux86, it was creating the link
>> correctly in this case.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I did some testing, and could not reproduce the problem.
> I then realized that as the sh link is managed by ALTERNATIVES
> mechanism, it will always point to bash instead of busybox.
>
> I tested it by the following steps:
> 1. build core-image-minimal with bash installed
> 2. reinstall bash
> 3. reinstall busybox
>
> So I think the current code is right.
>
> I'm not sure if I missed something. If so, could you please provide
> more information?
>
> Best Regards,
> Chen Qi
Hi Chen,
You are right, sorry! I think I figured out what I've missed. On an
image I have disabled busybox ash completely, therefore I didn't saw the
update-alternative running for sh. Because it was an older version of
yocto without the above patch, I've got an invalid image. I then tough
the same problem would appear if I enable busybox ash again, but in this
case update-alternative would run, so the problem wouldn't appear.
Sorry for the false alarm!
Regards,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-19 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-17 14:07 Busybox sh link Stefan Eichenberger
2014-11-18 3:07 ` ChenQi
2014-11-18 16:34 ` Stefan Eichenberger
2014-11-19 6:00 ` ChenQi
2014-11-19 9:08 ` Stefan Eichenberger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.