All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Suresh E. Warrier" <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Tracepoints for KVM HV guest interactions
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:10:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546DDA24.8040604@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3wy6tp0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>



On 20.11.14 11:40, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Suresh E. Warrier" <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> This patch adds trace points in the guest entry and exit code and also
>> for exceptions handled by the host in kernel mode - hypercalls and page
>> faults. The new events are added to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events
>> under a new subsystem called kvm_hv.
> 
> ........
> 
>>  	/* Set this explicitly in case thread 0 doesn't have a vcpu */
>> @@ -1687,6 +1691,9 @@ static void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
>>  
>>  	vc->vcore_state = VCORE_RUNNING;
>>  	preempt_disable();
>> +
>> +	trace_kvmppc_run_core(vc, 0);
>> +
>>  	spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
> 
> Do we really want to call tracepoint with spin lock held ? Is that a good
> thing to do ?. 

I thought it was safe to call tracepoints inside of spin lock regions?
Steve?


Alex

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Suresh E. Warrier" <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Tracepoints for KVM HV guest interactions
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:10:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546DDA24.8040604@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3wy6tp0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>



On 20.11.14 11:40, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Suresh E. Warrier" <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> This patch adds trace points in the guest entry and exit code and also
>> for exceptions handled by the host in kernel mode - hypercalls and page
>> faults. The new events are added to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events
>> under a new subsystem called kvm_hv.
> 
> ........
> 
>>  	/* Set this explicitly in case thread 0 doesn't have a vcpu */
>> @@ -1687,6 +1691,9 @@ static void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
>>  
>>  	vc->vcore_state = VCORE_RUNNING;
>>  	preempt_disable();
>> +
>> +	trace_kvmppc_run_core(vc, 0);
>> +
>>  	spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
> 
> Do we really want to call tracepoint with spin lock held ? Is that a good
> thing to do ?. 

I thought it was safe to call tracepoints inside of spin lock regions?
Steve?


Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-20 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13 23:29 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Tracepoints for KVM HV guest interactions Suresh E. Warrier
2014-11-13 23:29 ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-11-14 10:56 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-14 10:56   ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-19 21:54   ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-11-19 21:54     ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-11-20 12:08     ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-20 12:08       ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-20 10:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-11-20 10:52   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-11-20 12:10   ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-11-20 12:10     ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-20 14:01     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-20 14:01       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-02  1:19       ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-12-02  1:19         ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-12-04  0:48 ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-12-04  0:48   ` Suresh E. Warrier
2014-12-17 12:31   ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-17 12:31     ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546DDA24.8040604@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.