All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew.Jackson@arm.com (Andrew Jackson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:02:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54783A2F.5010405@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf>

On 11/28/14 08:19, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
> Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
>> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
>> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
>> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
>> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>>
>> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
>> retrieved is not valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> 
> It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
> 	[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
> 

Thank you for the heads-up, I'd not seen that.  I'll consider how my patch might be modified to suit the new infrastructure.

    Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:02:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54783A2F.5010405@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf>

On 11/28/14 08:19, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
> Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
>> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
>> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
>> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
>> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>>
>> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
>> retrieved is not valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> 
> It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
> 	[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
> 

Thank you for the heads-up, I'd not seen that.  I'll consider how my patch might be modified to suit the new infrastructure.

    Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:02:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54783A2F.5010405@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf>

On 11/28/14 08:19, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
> Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
>> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
>> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
>> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
>> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>>
>> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
>> retrieved is not valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> 
> It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
> 	[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
> 

Thank you for the heads-up, I'd not seen that.  I'll consider how my patch might be modified to suit the new infrastructure.

    Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18 17:41 [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time Andrew Jackson
2014-11-18 17:41 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-28  8:19 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-28  8:19   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-28  8:19   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-28  9:02   ` Andrew Jackson [this message]
2014-11-28  9:02     ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-28  9:02     ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-29 10:41     ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-29 10:41       ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-29 10:41       ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-12-01 13:19       ` Andrew Jackson
2014-12-01 13:19         ` Andrew Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54783A2F.5010405@arm.com \
    --to=andrew.jackson@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.