From: moinejf@free.fr (Jean-Francois Moine)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:19:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546B84C6.3090809@arm.com>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>
> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
> retrieved is not valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
--
Ken ar c'henta? | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
To: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:19:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546B84C6.3090809@arm.com>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>
> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
> retrieved is not valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
To: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:19:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546B84C6.3090809@arm.com>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com> wrote:
> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>
> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
> retrieved is not valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
[PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-18 17:41 [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails first time Andrew Jackson
2014-11-18 17:41 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-28 8:19 ` Jean-Francois Moine [this message]
2014-11-28 8:19 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-28 8:19 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-28 9:02 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-28 9:02 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-28 9:02 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-11-29 10:41 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-29 10:41 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-11-29 10:41 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-12-01 13:19 ` Andrew Jackson
2014-12-01 13:19 ` Andrew Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141128091905.3e491c39@armhf \
--to=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.