All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@freescale.com>
To: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:14:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com> (raw)

Hello,

While doing some performance testing of a KVM guest on a PPC platform, I 
noticed that there's a read of the CPU_WHOAMI register after each MPIC 
EOI [1]. This has been present since the initial implementation of the 
MPIC driver [2]. In a KVM virtualized environment, this results in an 
additional kvm_exit.

Is the read back necessary? Is it used to provide some sort of 
synchronization mechanism, making sure that nothing else is executed 
until the EOI write is finished? I eliminated the mpic_cpu_read call and 
run the kernel on hardware and noticed no anomaly, however I am not sure 
of all the implications and race conditions it might lead to.

I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in 
the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I 
guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is 
running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer 
requires a readback.

Thank you,
Bogdan P.

[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c#L659
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/483

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@freescale.com>
To: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:14:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com> (raw)

Hello,

While doing some performance testing of a KVM guest on a PPC platform, I 
noticed that there's a read of the CPU_WHOAMI register after each MPIC 
EOI [1]. This has been present since the initial implementation of the 
MPIC driver [2]. In a KVM virtualized environment, this results in an 
additional kvm_exit.

Is the read back necessary? Is it used to provide some sort of 
synchronization mechanism, making sure that nothing else is executed 
until the EOI write is finished? I eliminated the mpic_cpu_read call and 
run the kernel on hardware and noticed no anomaly, however I am not sure 
of all the implications and race conditions it might lead to.

I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in 
the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I 
guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is 
running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer 
requires a readback.

Thank you,
Bogdan P.

[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c#L659
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/483

             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 14:14 Purcareata Bogdan [this message]
2015-01-05 14:14 ` [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI? Purcareata Bogdan
2015-01-05 17:46 ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-05 17:46   ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-05 18:10   ` Scott Wood
2015-01-05 18:10     ` Scott Wood
2015-01-05 18:43     ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-05 18:43       ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-07  2:56       ` Scott Wood
2015-01-07  2:56         ` Scott Wood
2015-01-07 14:44     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:44       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 17:04       ` Scott Wood
2015-01-07 17:04         ` Scott Wood
2015-01-08 19:17         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-08 19:17           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:43   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:43     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-08  0:49   ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-01-08  0:49     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com \
    --to=b43198@freescale.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.