All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	b43-dev-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	stefano.brivio-hl5o88x/ua9eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers:net:wireless: Add proper locking for the function,  b43_op_beacon_set_tim in main.c
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:16:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AAC6EE.2000603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tx05378x.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

Kalle,
That's fine. On the other hand I am interested in the
reasons why this patch was dropped so I can send in a
version 2 of this patch.
Regards Nick 

On 2015-01-05 04:29 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> This adds proper locking for the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim in
>> main.c by using the mutex lock in the structure pointer wl, as
>> embedded into this pointer as a mutex in order to protect against
>> multiple access to the pointer wl when updating the templates for this
>> pointer in the function, b43_update_templates internally in the
>> function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> 
> Based on the discussion I have dropped this patch.
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nick <xerofoify-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	b43-dev-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	stefano.brivio-hl5o88x/ua9eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:net:wireless: Add proper locking for the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim in main.c
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:16:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AAC6EE.2000603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tx05378x.fsf-HodKDYzPHsUD5k0oWYwrnHL1okKdlPRT@public.gmane.org>

Kalle,
That's fine. On the other hand I am interested in the
reasons why this patch was dropped so I can send in a
version 2 of this patch.
Regards Nick 

On 2015-01-05 04:29 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Nicholas Krause <xerofoify-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
>> This adds proper locking for the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim in
>> main.c by using the mutex lock in the structure pointer wl, as
>> embedded into this pointer as a mutex in order to protect against
>> multiple access to the pointer wl when updating the templates for this
>> pointer in the function, b43_update_templates internally in the
>> function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Based on the discussion I have dropped this patch.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-02  7:34 [PATCH] drivers:net:wireless: Add proper locking for the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim in main.c Nicholas Krause
2015-01-02  7:34 ` Nicholas Krause
2015-01-02  9:27 ` Michael Büsch
2015-01-02  9:27   ` Michael Büsch
2015-01-02 11:19   ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-01-02 11:19     ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-01-02 11:42     ` Michael Büsch
2015-01-02 11:42       ` Michael Büsch
2015-01-02 17:13   ` nick
2015-01-02 17:13     ` nick
2015-01-02 16:40 ` Larry Finger
2015-01-02 16:40   ` Larry Finger
2015-01-05  9:29 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-05  9:29   ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-05 17:16   ` nick [this message]
2015-01-05 17:16     ` nick
2015-01-05 17:46     ` Larry Finger
2015-01-05 17:46       ` Larry Finger
2015-01-05 18:21       ` nick
2015-01-05 18:21         ` nick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AAC6EE.2000603@gmail.com \
    --to=xerofoify@gmail.com \
    --cc=b43-dev-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=stefano.brivio-hl5o88x/ua9eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.