All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: HTW: Prevent accidental HTW start due to nested htw_{start,stop}
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C62D40.3040906@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C62D26.80907@imgtec.com>

On 01/26/2015 12:03 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 26/01/15 11:47, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/26/2015 11:36 AM, James Hogan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> +		raw_current_cpu_data.htw_seq++;				\
>>>
>>> not "if (!raw_current_cpu_data.htw_seq++)) {"?
>> Why?
>>
>> on _stop() calls you just increment it. The _start() will do the right
>> thing then.
>>
>> I think what you suggest it to move the if() condition from the _start()
>> to _stop().
> 
> I just mean you only need to disable htw the first time its called. I
> guess the extra branch every time could be worse than the extra disable
> and ehb when nesting does occur, so its probably premature optimisation.
> 
> Up to you.
> 
> Cheers
> James
> 
good idea i will change it.

-- 
markos

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: HTW: Prevent accidental HTW start due to nested htw_{start,stop}
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C62D40.3040906@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150126120416.stl2a_tDlWSeG2yWVAUUd7tSvHI_tnUs4LgrC_cc-S0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C62D26.80907@imgtec.com>

On 01/26/2015 12:03 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 26/01/15 11:47, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/26/2015 11:36 AM, James Hogan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> +		raw_current_cpu_data.htw_seq++;				\
>>>
>>> not "if (!raw_current_cpu_data.htw_seq++)) {"?
>> Why?
>>
>> on _stop() calls you just increment it. The _start() will do the right
>> thing then.
>>
>> I think what you suggest it to move the if() condition from the _start()
>> to _stop().
> 
> I just mean you only need to disable htw the first time its called. I
> guess the extra branch every time could be worse than the extra disable
> and ehb when nesting does occur, so its probably premature optimisation.
> 
> Up to you.
> 
> Cheers
> James
> 
good idea i will change it.

-- 
markos

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-26 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26  9:40 [PATCH 0/3 3.19] HTW fixes Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40 ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: asm: pgtable: Add c0 hazards on HTW start/stop sequences Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40   ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: HTW: Prevent accidental HTW start due to nested htw_{start,stop} Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40   ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 11:36   ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 11:36     ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 11:38     ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 11:38       ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 11:47     ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 11:47       ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 12:03       ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 12:03         ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 12:03       ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 12:03         ` James Hogan
2015-01-26 12:04         ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2015-01-26 12:04           ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 13:04   ` [PATCH v2 " Markos Chandras
2015-01-26 13:04     ` Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: asm: pgtable: Prevent HTW race when updating PTEs Markos Chandras
2015-01-26  9:40   ` Markos Chandras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C62D40.3040906@imgtec.com \
    --to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.