[meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[Armin Kuster]

suricata needs a package in meta-networking

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
---
 conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index c5a717b..650e6ed 100644
--- a/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/conf/layer.conf
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "security"
 BBFILE_PATTERN_security = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
 BBFILE_PRIORITY_security = "6"
 
-LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer"
+LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer networking-layer"
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[Paul Eggleton]

On Monday 02 February 2015 07:35:51 Armin Kuster wrote:
> suricata needs a package in meta-networking
> 
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
> ---
>  conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
> index c5a717b..650e6ed 100644
> --- a/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "security"
>  BBFILE_PATTERN_security = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
>  BBFILE_PRIORITY_security = "6"
> 
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer"
> +LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer networking-layer"

Can you please also update the OE layer index?

http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-security/

I added meta-perl and meta-oe this morning based on the meta-security README - 
the latter isn't represented in your LAYERDEPENDS value though, so all three 
places ought to be made consistent with whatever the actual set of 
requirements is. 

(If people are starting to use LAYERDEPENDS a bit more it might make sense for 
us to add some code to the layer index update script to try to update its 
dependency list based upon LAYERDEPENDS and BBFILE_COLLECTIONS; up to now it 
hasn't seen a huge amount of use hence I hadn't done that.)

Thanks,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[akuster808]

Paul,

Is the idea to include all layers required including the cascaded ones?

i.e: meta-networking requires mete-python, should I include that one too?

On 02/02/2015 08:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2015 07:35:51 Armin Kuster wrote:
>> suricata needs a package in meta-networking
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
>> index c5a717b..650e6ed 100644
>> --- a/conf/layer.conf
>> +++ b/conf/layer.conf
>> @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "security"
>>   BBFILE_PATTERN_security = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
>>   BBFILE_PRIORITY_security = "6"
>>
>> -LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer"
>> +LAYERDEPENDS_security = "openembedded-layer perl-layer networking-layer"
>
> Can you please also update the OE layer index?

Do I do that manually or is it picked up from the README?

- armin

>
> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-security/
>
> I added meta-perl and meta-oe this morning based on the meta-security README -
> the latter isn't represented in your LAYERDEPENDS value though, so all three
> places ought to be made consistent with whatever the actual set of
> requirements is.
>
> (If people are starting to use LAYERDEPENDS a bit more it might make sense for
> us to add some code to the layer index update script to try to update its
> dependency list based upon LAYERDEPENDS and BBFILE_COLLECTIONS; up to now it
> hasn't seen a huge amount of use hence I hadn't done that.)
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>

Re: [meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[Paul Eggleton]

On Monday 02 February 2015 10:24:21 akuster808 wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 08:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Can you please also update the OE layer index?
> 
> Do I do that manually or is it picked up from the README?

No, it needs to be done manually, I don't have anything to parse a README and 
extract dependencies at the moment.

> > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-securit
> > y/
> > 
> > I added meta-perl and meta-oe this morning based on the meta-security
> > README - the latter isn't represented in your LAYERDEPENDS value though,
> > so all three places ought to be made consistent with whatever the actual
> > set of requirements is.
> > 
> > (If people are starting to use LAYERDEPENDS a bit more it might make sense
> > for us to add some code to the layer index update script to try to update
> > its dependency list based upon LAYERDEPENDS and BBFILE_COLLECTIONS; up to
> > now it hasn't seen a huge amount of use hence I hadn't done that.)
>
> Is the idea to include all layers required including the cascaded ones?
> 
> i.e: meta-networking requires mete-python, should I include that one too?

No, no need to do that - just the direct dependencies is enough.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking

[akuster808]

layer index updated.

I will update README next.

thanks,
Armin

On 02/02/2015 10:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2015 10:24:21 akuster808 wrote:
>> On 02/02/2015 08:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> Can you please also update the OE layer index?
>>
>> Do I do that manually or is it picked up from the README?
>
> No, it needs to be done manually, I don't have anything to parse a README and
> extract dependencies at the moment.
>
>>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-securit
>>> y/
>>>
>>> I added meta-perl and meta-oe this morning based on the meta-security
>>> README - the latter isn't represented in your LAYERDEPENDS value though,
>>> so all three places ought to be made consistent with whatever the actual
>>> set of requirements is.
>>>
>>> (If people are starting to use LAYERDEPENDS a bit more it might make sense
>>> for us to add some code to the layer index update script to try to update
>>> its dependency list based upon LAYERDEPENDS and BBFILE_COLLECTIONS; up to
>>> now it hasn't seen a huge amount of use hence I hadn't done that.)
>>
>> Is the idea to include all layers required including the cascaded ones?
>>
>> i.e: meta-networking requires mete-python, should I include that one too?
>
> No, no need to do that - just the direct dependencies is enough.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>