From: zhangfei.gao@linaro.org (zhangfei)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] phy: add phy-hi6220-usb
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:27:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E70C0F.1030601@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150220043805.GA22128@saruman.tx.rr.com>
On 02/20/2015 12:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:07:21AM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>> Hi, Balbi
>>
>> On 02/18/2015 10:35 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>>>> Hi, Kishon
>>>>
>>>> On 02/18/2015 01:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 12 February 2015 01:07 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>>>> Add usb phy controller for hi6220 platform
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c | 306
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>>>>
>>>>> why is this driver in drivers/phy when it doesn't use the generic PHY
>>>>> framework at all?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Balbi recommended "new drivers only on drivers/phy/", including usb
>>>> phy.
>>>
>>> but it should use the API too. It's not only about a directory, you need
>>> to use the new API.
>>>
>>>> So Move drivers/usb/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c to
>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c, required by Balbi.
>>>
>>> you're reading what I stated the way you like.
>>
>> Sorry for my bad understanding.
>>
>> Still not clear about the otg_set_peripheral, which is required in
>> phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>
>> 1. drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c use
>> otg_set_peripheral(hsotg->uphy->otg, &hsotg->gadget);
>>
>> 2. include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> struct phy do not have member otg, while struct usb_phy has.
>>
>> Could you give more hints?
>
> your set_peripheral doesn't do anything, just holds a pointer. Might as
> well not implement it. I'll review your driver more fully tomorrow.
>
> There a few things which must be changed.
>
Thanks in advance.
We need this call back set_peripheral setting otg->gadget, which used in
usb_gadget_connect/disconnect(otg->gadget).
The workable method test here is not provide phy-names = "usb2-phy";
Then dwc2 will still use hsotg->uphy instead of hsotg->phy.
Though devm_phy_create is used in phy-hi6220-usb.c, phy_ops is not used
in fact.
Thanks
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zhangfei <zhangfei.gao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
Peter Chen <peter.chen-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
"dan . zhao" <dan.zhao-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
Wangbinghui <wangbinghui-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] phy: add phy-hi6220-usb
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:27:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E70C0F.1030601@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150220043805.GA22128-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
On 02/20/2015 12:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:07:21AM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>> Hi, Balbi
>>
>> On 02/18/2015 10:35 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>>>> Hi, Kishon
>>>>
>>>> On 02/18/2015 01:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 12 February 2015 01:07 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>>>> Add usb phy controller for hi6220 platform
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c | 306
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>>>>
>>>>> why is this driver in drivers/phy when it doesn't use the generic PHY
>>>>> framework at all?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Balbi recommended "new drivers only on drivers/phy/", including usb
>>>> phy.
>>>
>>> but it should use the API too. It's not only about a directory, you need
>>> to use the new API.
>>>
>>>> So Move drivers/usb/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c to
>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c, required by Balbi.
>>>
>>> you're reading what I stated the way you like.
>>
>> Sorry for my bad understanding.
>>
>> Still not clear about the otg_set_peripheral, which is required in
>> phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>
>> 1. drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c use
>> otg_set_peripheral(hsotg->uphy->otg, &hsotg->gadget);
>>
>> 2. include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> struct phy do not have member otg, while struct usb_phy has.
>>
>> Could you give more hints?
>
> your set_peripheral doesn't do anything, just holds a pointer. Might as
> well not implement it. I'll review your driver more fully tomorrow.
>
> There a few things which must be changed.
>
Thanks in advance.
We need this call back set_peripheral setting otg->gadget, which used in
usb_gadget_connect/disconnect(otg->gadget).
The workable method test here is not provide phy-names = "usb2-phy";
Then dwc2 will still use hsotg->uphy instead of hsotg->phy.
Though devm_phy_create is used in phy-hi6220-usb.c, phy_ops is not used
in fact.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zhangfei <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
mark.rutland@arm.com, Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
"dan . zhao" <dan.zhao@hisilicon.com>,
Wangbinghui <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] phy: add phy-hi6220-usb
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:27:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E70C0F.1030601@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150220043805.GA22128@saruman.tx.rr.com>
On 02/20/2015 12:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:07:21AM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>> Hi, Balbi
>>
>> On 02/18/2015 10:35 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:
>>>> Hi, Kishon
>>>>
>>>> On 02/18/2015 01:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 12 February 2015 01:07 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>>>> Add usb phy controller for hi6220 platform
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c | 306
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>>>>
>>>>> why is this driver in drivers/phy when it doesn't use the generic PHY
>>>>> framework at all?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Balbi recommended "new drivers only on drivers/phy/", including usb
>>>> phy.
>>>
>>> but it should use the API too. It's not only about a directory, you need
>>> to use the new API.
>>>
>>>> So Move drivers/usb/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c to
>>>> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c, required by Balbi.
>>>
>>> you're reading what I stated the way you like.
>>
>> Sorry for my bad understanding.
>>
>> Still not clear about the otg_set_peripheral, which is required in
>> phy-hi6220-usb.c
>>
>> 1. drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c use
>> otg_set_peripheral(hsotg->uphy->otg, &hsotg->gadget);
>>
>> 2. include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> struct phy do not have member otg, while struct usb_phy has.
>>
>> Could you give more hints?
>
> your set_peripheral doesn't do anything, just holds a pointer. Might as
> well not implement it. I'll review your driver more fully tomorrow.
>
> There a few things which must be changed.
>
Thanks in advance.
We need this call back set_peripheral setting otg->gadget, which used in
usb_gadget_connect/disconnect(otg->gadget).
The workable method test here is not provide phy-names = "usb2-phy";
Then dwc2 will still use hsotg->uphy instead of hsotg->phy.
Though devm_phy_create is used in phy-hi6220-usb.c, phy_ops is not used
in fact.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 7:37 [PATCH v4 0/4] add usb support for hi6220 Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: add dt binding info for hi6220 dwc2 Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: add dt binding info for hi6220 Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] usb: dwc2: platform: add hi6220 support Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] phy: add phy-hi6220-usb Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-12 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2015-02-18 5:35 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-02-18 5:35 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-02-18 5:35 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-02-18 5:44 ` zhangfei
2015-02-18 5:44 ` zhangfei
2015-02-18 14:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-18 14:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-18 14:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 3:07 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 3:07 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 4:38 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 4:38 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 4:38 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 10:27 ` zhangfei [this message]
2015-02-20 10:27 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 10:27 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 14:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 14:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 14:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 15:44 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 15:44 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 15:44 ` zhangfei
2015-02-20 16:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 16:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-20 16:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-21 15:03 ` zhangfei
2015-02-21 15:03 ` zhangfei
2015-02-21 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-21 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-21 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-22 3:10 ` zhangfei
2015-02-22 3:10 ` zhangfei
2015-02-23 15:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-23 15:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-23 15:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-25 13:28 ` zhangfei
2015-02-25 13:28 ` zhangfei
2015-02-25 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-25 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-25 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-24 10:13 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-24 10:13 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-24 10:13 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-26 8:48 ` zhangfei
2015-02-26 8:48 ` zhangfei
2015-02-26 8:48 ` zhangfei
2015-02-26 9:36 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-26 9:36 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-26 9:36 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-27 2:07 ` Peter Chen
2015-02-27 2:07 ` Peter Chen
2015-02-27 2:07 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E70C0F.1030601@linaro.org \
--to=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.