All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:32:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EF2052.6030909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423419822-6258-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Le 08/02/2015 19:23, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the
> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not
> checked by irq core code).
> 
> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this
> problem.
> 
> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into
> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq
> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

If it can speed up things:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

Linus,
can we schedule this fix during the 4.0-rc phase?

Bye,

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index f4cd0b9..a481406 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -1477,28 +1477,25 @@ static void gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
>  	/* the interrupt is already cleared before by reading ISR */
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> +static int gpio_irq_request_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(at91_gpio->chip.dev, "unable to lock pind %lu IRQ\n",
>  			d->hwirq);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -	gpio_irq_unmask(d);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +static void gpio_irq_release_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  
> -	gpio_irq_mask(d);
>  	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1577,8 +1574,8 @@ void at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume(void)
>  static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>  	.name		= "GPIO",
>  	.irq_ack	= gpio_irq_ack,
> -	.irq_startup	= gpio_irq_startup,
> -	.irq_shutdown	= gpio_irq_shutdown,
> +	.irq_request_resources = gpio_irq_request_res,
> +	.irq_release_resources = gpio_irq_release_res,
>  	.irq_disable	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_mask	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= gpio_irq_unmask,
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:32:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EF2052.6030909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423419822-6258-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Le 08/02/2015 19:23, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the
> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not
> checked by irq core code).
> 
> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this
> problem.
> 
> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into
> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq
> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

If it can speed up things:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

Linus,
can we schedule this fix during the 4.0-rc phase?

Bye,

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index f4cd0b9..a481406 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -1477,28 +1477,25 @@ static void gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
>  	/* the interrupt is already cleared before by reading ISR */
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> +static int gpio_irq_request_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(at91_gpio->chip.dev, "unable to lock pind %lu IRQ\n",
>  			d->hwirq);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -	gpio_irq_unmask(d);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +static void gpio_irq_release_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  
> -	gpio_irq_mask(d);
>  	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1577,8 +1574,8 @@ void at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume(void)
>  static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>  	.name		= "GPIO",
>  	.irq_ack	= gpio_irq_ack,
> -	.irq_startup	= gpio_irq_startup,
> -	.irq_shutdown	= gpio_irq_shutdown,
> +	.irq_request_resources = gpio_irq_request_res,
> +	.irq_release_resources = gpio_irq_release_res,
>  	.irq_disable	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_mask	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= gpio_irq_unmask,
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:32:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EF2052.6030909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423419822-6258-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Le 08/02/2015 19:23, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the
> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not
> checked by irq core code).
> 
> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this
> problem.
> 
> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into
> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq
> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

If it can speed up things:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

Linus,
can we schedule this fix during the 4.0-rc phase?

Bye,

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index f4cd0b9..a481406 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -1477,28 +1477,25 @@ static void gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
>  	/* the interrupt is already cleared before by reading ISR */
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> +static int gpio_irq_request_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(at91_gpio->chip.dev, "unable to lock pind %lu IRQ\n",
>  			d->hwirq);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -	gpio_irq_unmask(d);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +static void gpio_irq_release_res(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned	pin = d->hwirq;
>  
> -	gpio_irq_mask(d);
>  	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, pin);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1577,8 +1574,8 @@ void at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume(void)
>  static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>  	.name		= "GPIO",
>  	.irq_ack	= gpio_irq_ack,
> -	.irq_startup	= gpio_irq_startup,
> -	.irq_shutdown	= gpio_irq_shutdown,
> +	.irq_request_resources = gpio_irq_request_res,
> +	.irq_release_resources = gpio_irq_release_res,
>  	.irq_disable	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_mask	= gpio_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= gpio_irq_unmask,
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-26 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-08 18:23 [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods Boris Brezillon
2015-02-08 18:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-09 14:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-09 14:50   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-09 14:50   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-20  7:50   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-20  7:50     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-20  7:50     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-26 13:12     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 13:12       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 13:12       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-18 10:41 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-18 10:41   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-18 10:41   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-26 13:32 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-02-26 13:32   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-02-26 13:32   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-02-26 13:59   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-26 13:59     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-04 21:30 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-04 21:30   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-04 21:30   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-09 16:14 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-09 16:14   ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-10  8:34   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-10  8:34     ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-18  1:06     ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-18  1:06       ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-18  1:06       ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54EF2052.6030909@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jjhiblot@traphandler.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.