Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

[Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>]

On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>>> On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>> This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid
>>>>> double-registration of types:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which already exists
>>>>>
>>>>> Taking the textual description of a CPU type as part of a new type
>>>>> name
>>>>> is plain wrong, and so is unconditionally registering a new type here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't this break p8 support?
>>>
>>> Maybe, but p5 support was in longer and this is definitely a regression
>>> and really really wrong. If you know a way to fix it without handing it
>>> back to the IBM guys for more thought, feel free to give it a shot.
>>
>> I honestly don't fully remember what this was about. Wasn't this our
>> special KVM class that we use to create a compatible cpu type on the fly?
>>
>> Alexey, please take a look at it.
> 
> 
> I sent a note yesterday :-/ Here it is again:
> 
> With this revert, running qemu with HV KVM and -cpu POWER7 fails on real
> POWER7 machine as my machine has pvr 003f 0201 and POWER7 is an alias of
> POWER7_v2.3 (pvr 003f 0203); and this is what I tried to fix at the
> first place. QEMU looks at classes first, and if not found - at aliases,
> so this worked.
> 
> I would rename "POWER5+" to "POWER5+_0.0" and make "POWER5+" an alias
> for POWER5+_v2.1 (or POWER5+_0.0).

Care to send a patch?


Alex