Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>]

On 03/04/2015 07:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>> Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>>>> On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>>> This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid
>>>>>> double-registration of types:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which already exists
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Taking the textual description of a CPU type as part of a new type
>>>>>> name
>>>>>> is plain wrong, and so is unconditionally registering a new type here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't this break p8 support?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, but p5 support was in longer and this is definitely a regression
>>>> and really really wrong. If you know a way to fix it without handing it
>>>> back to the IBM guys for more thought, feel free to give it a shot.
>>>
>>> I honestly don't fully remember what this was about. Wasn't this our
>>> special KVM class that we use to create a compatible cpu type on the fly?
>>>
>>> Alexey, please take a look at it.
>>
>>
>> I sent a note yesterday :-/ Here it is again:
>>
>> With this revert, running qemu with HV KVM and -cpu POWER7 fails on real
>> POWER7 machine as my machine has pvr 003f 0201 and POWER7 is an alias of
>> POWER7_v2.3 (pvr 003f 0203); and this is what I tried to fix at the
>> first place. QEMU looks at classes first, and if not found - at aliases,
>> so this worked.
>>
>> I would rename "POWER5+" to "POWER5+_0.0" and make "POWER5+" an alias
>> for POWER5+_v2.1 (or POWER5+_0.0).
>
> Care to send a patch?

I wonder if Andreas has a better solution to my initial problem - he 
obviously won't like the proposed patch :)




-- 
Alexey