From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FE589C.1050705@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU_3FS6B7LtkAwdC3e8xfiwdhPjkVWPgxP1Vy2uPeqMtA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/09/2015 05:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> per-pidns like this is no good. You shouldn't be able to create a
> non-paranoid pidns if your parent is paranoid.
That sounds like a reasonable addition that shouldn't be hard to add.
> Also, at some point we need actual per-ns controls. This mount option
> stuff is hideous.
So,
per-pidns == bad
per-ns == good
If the pid namespace is the wrong place, which namespace is the right place?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FE589C.1050705@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU_3FS6B7LtkAwdC3e8xfiwdhPjkVWPgxP1Vy2uPeqMtA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/09/2015 05:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> per-pidns like this is no good. You shouldn't be able to create a
> non-paranoid pidns if your parent is paranoid.
That sounds like a reasonable addition that shouldn't be hard to add.
> Also, at some point we need actual per-ns controls. This mount option
> stuff is hideous.
So,
per-pidns == bad
per-ns == good
If the pid namespace is the wrong place, which namespace is the right place?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 21:11 [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-03-09 21:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-03-09 21:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2015-03-09 21:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2015-03-09 22:09 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-03-09 22:09 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-03-10 0:11 ` Kees Cook
2015-03-10 0:11 ` Kees Cook
2015-03-10 0:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 0:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 2:36 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-03-10 2:36 ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-16 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-16 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-17 0:49 ` Mark Seaborn
2015-03-17 0:49 ` Mark Seaborn
2015-03-17 1:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17 1:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17 11:16 ` rowhammer and pagemap (was Re: [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace) Pavel Machek
2015-03-17 11:16 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-17 17:58 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-03-17 17:58 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-03-23 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-23 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-19 12:51 ` [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-19 12:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-23 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-23 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-23 22:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-23 22:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FE589C.1050705@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mseaborn@chromium.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.