* [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS
@ 2015-04-17 16:48 Nikolay Dimitrov
2015-04-17 16:50 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Dimitrov @ 2015-04-17 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi guys,
Why is required to add "SPL" to CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS, when we have
also CONFIG_SPL? I found the following mx6 boards are doing it:
configs/mx6sabresd_spl_defconfig
configs/cm_fx6_defconfig
configs/mx6cuboxi_spl_defconfig
Thanks and regards,
Nikolay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS
2015-04-17 16:48 [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS Nikolay Dimitrov
@ 2015-04-17 16:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-17 17:03 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2015-04-17 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Nikolay,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Why is required to add "SPL" to CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS, when we have
> also CONFIG_SPL? I found the following mx6 boards are doing it:
>
> configs/mx6sabresd_spl_defconfig
Yes, not needed. I will remove it.
> configs/cm_fx6_defconfig
> configs/mx6cuboxi_spl_defconfig
I remove the 'SPL' in v2.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS
2015-04-17 16:50 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2015-04-17 17:03 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
2015-04-17 17:16 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Dimitrov @ 2015-04-17 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Fabio,
On 04/17/2015 07:50 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Why is required to add "SPL" to CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS, when we have
>> also CONFIG_SPL? I found the following mx6 boards are doing it:
>>
>> configs/mx6sabresd_spl_defconfig
>
> Yes, not needed. I will remove it.
>
>> configs/cm_fx6_defconfig
>> configs/mx6cuboxi_spl_defconfig
>
> I remove the 'SPL' in v2.
Sorry if you felt like this, but I wasn't pointing at you specifically.
I'm just not sure what's the proper way to configure SPL support these
days, after so many updates to the SPL code & Kconfig migration.
Regards,
Nikolay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS
2015-04-17 17:03 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
@ 2015-04-17 17:16 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2015-04-17 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Nikolay,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg> wrote:
> Sorry if you felt like this, but I wasn't pointing at you specifically.
No problem. Just to clarify: during the hummingboard patch submission
Tom Rini suggested me to remove the 'SPL'.
So I did it (among other things) and sent a v2.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-17 17:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-17 16:48 [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS Nikolay Dimitrov
2015-04-17 16:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-17 17:03 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
2015-04-17 17:16 ` Fabio Estevam
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.