From: David Zafman <dzafman@redhat.com>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shu, Xinxin" <xinxin.shu@intel.com>,
sjust@redhat.com
Subject: Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:45:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55367E8D.1090805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1504210851130.18547@cobra.newdream.net>
In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the
ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it
passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen:
bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op
list-pgs
David
On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a
> release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing
> tests yet?
>
> The only other one I'm worried about is
>
> 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup
>
> Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks
> who upgrade too?
>
> sage
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ).
>>
>> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 10:12 should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? Loic Dachary
2015-04-21 15:52 ` Sage Weil
2015-04-21 16:45 ` David Zafman [this message]
[not found] ` <acaeb07b-41c3-40bc-87a3-9d82ce346ae7@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <5537229F.4050501@redhat.com>
2015-04-22 8:26 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-05 9:17 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-05 18:58 ` David Zafman
2015-05-05 19:04 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-05 19:24 ` David Zafman
2015-05-15 13:44 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-15 19:05 ` Sage Weil
2015-05-15 20:19 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-18 12:47 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-22 10:43 ` Loic Dachary
2015-05-22 17:34 ` Sage Weil
2015-05-05 9:25 ` Loic Dachary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55367E8D.1090805@redhat.com \
--to=dzafman@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=sjust@redhat.com \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
--cc=xinxin.shu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.