Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3419 bytes --]

Hi David,

These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks now, did you notice problems ?

Cheers

On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote:
> 
> All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch.
> 
> After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include these 2 commits.   Was there an issue with this change?
> 
> David
> 
> commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc
> Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0
> Author: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
> Date:   Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200
> 
>     Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly
> 
>     ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import
> 
>     Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
> 
> commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60
> Author: David Zafman <dzafman@redhat.com>
> Date:   Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700
> 
>     ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import
> 
>     Fixes: #11139
> 
>     Signed-off-by: David Zafman <dzafman@redhat.com>
>     (cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8cd34)
> 
> David
> 
> On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of the current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch?
>> -Sam
>>
>> Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/>
>>
>> *From:* David Zafman
>> *Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM
>> *To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary
>> *Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@redhat.com
>> *Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the
>> ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly).  We considered it
>> passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen:
>>
>> bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op
>> list-pgs
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a
>> > release, IMO.  David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing
>> > tests yet?
>> >
>> > The only other one I'm worried about is
>> >
>> > 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup
>> >
>> > Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks
>> > who upgrade too?
>> >
>> > sage
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Sage,
>> >>
>> >> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ).
>> >>
>> >> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> >>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]