Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Hi,

Unless I'm mistaken it looks like

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11429 OSD::load_pgs: we need to handle the case where an upgrade from earlier versions which ignored non-existent pgs resurrects a pg with a prehistoric osdmap

deserves to be in the next release. With this one, do you think v0.80.10 should be published ? There was concerns about ceph_objectstore_tools and thrashing but my understanding is that the nightlies ran enough tests in the past two weeks to clear that.

If there is not enough incentive to publish v0.80.10 at the moment we can proceed with another batch of backports (about 10 of them pending) and test them.

Cheers

On 21/04/2015 12:12, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ). 
> 
> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ?
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]