All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: hs@denx.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 06:54:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556418A9.8010603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5563EEF9.3080901@denx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]



On 26/05/15 06:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:

>> Without locking, the initmem may be freed while fb_find_logo() is
>> running.
> 
> Yes, you are right, that must be added ... but has such a change a
> chance to go in mainline?

I don't know. To be honest, this whole thing feels a bit like hackery. I
think initdata should only be accessed from initcalls, never asynchronously.

> BTW: Could this not be currently a problem on multicore systems?
> If lets say core 2 just draws the logo, another core 1 calls
> fb_logo_late_init() and later core 1 free_initmem(), while the core 2
> still draws it?

Yes, I think so...

So, maybe it would be better to not even try to go forward with the
current approach. Two approaches come to my mind:

1) Keep the logos in the memory, and don't even try to free them. I
don't know many bytes they are in total, though.

2) Make a copy of the logos to a kmalloced area at some early boot
stage. Then manually free the logos at some point (after the first
access to the logos? after a certain time (urgh...)?).

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: <hs@denx.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:54:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556418A9.8010603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5563EEF9.3080901@denx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]



On 26/05/15 06:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:

>> Without locking, the initmem may be freed while fb_find_logo() is
>> running.
> 
> Yes, you are right, that must be added ... but has such a change a
> chance to go in mainline?

I don't know. To be honest, this whole thing feels a bit like hackery. I
think initdata should only be accessed from initcalls, never asynchronously.

> BTW: Could this not be currently a problem on multicore systems?
> If lets say core 2 just draws the logo, another core 1 calls
> fb_logo_late_init() and later core 1 free_initmem(), while the core 2
> still draws it?

Yes, I think so...

So, maybe it would be better to not even try to go forward with the
current approach. Two approaches come to my mind:

1) Keep the logos in the memory, and don't even try to free them. I
don't know many bytes they are in total, though.

2) Make a copy of the logos to a kmalloced area at some early boot
stage. Then manually free the logos at some point (after the first
access to the logos? after a certain time (urgh...)?).

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-26  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-06  7:09 [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed Heiko Schocher
2015-05-06  7:09 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-25  5:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-25  5:57   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26  3:56   ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  3:56     ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  6:54     ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-05-26  6:54       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26  7:08       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:08         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:15         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26  7:15           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26  7:23           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:23             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:29           ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:29             ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:17       ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:17         ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:25           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:35           ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:35             ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26  7:41             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26  7:41               ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556418A9.8010603@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.