From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 07:17:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55641E1E.9010607@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556418A9.8010603@ti.com>
Hello Tomi,
Am 26.05.2015 08:54, schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
>
>
> On 26/05/15 06:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>>> Without locking, the initmem may be freed while fb_find_logo() is
>>> running.
>>
>> Yes, you are right, that must be added ... but has such a change a
>> chance to go in mainline?
>
> I don't know. To be honest, this whole thing feels a bit like hackery. I
Full Ack ;-)
> think initdata should only be accessed from initcalls, never asynchronously.
Yes.
>> BTW: Could this not be currently a problem on multicore systems?
>> If lets say core 2 just draws the logo, another core 1 calls
>> fb_logo_late_init() and later core 1 free_initmem(), while the core 2
>> still draws it?
>
> Yes, I think so...
>
> So, maybe it would be better to not even try to go forward with the
> current approach. Two approaches come to my mind:
>
> 1) Keep the logos in the memory, and don't even try to free them. I
> don't know many bytes they are in total, though.
That was my first thought too... but we waste memory ... not nice.
> 2) Make a copy of the logos to a kmalloced area at some early boot
> stage. Then manually free the logos at some point (after the first
> access to the logos? after a certain time (urgh...)?).
maybe yes ... or ...
3) wait for all cores, until they reached SYSTEM_FREEING_MEM and
free init mem only than? But are all cores used/started when booting?
4) draw only one logo even on multicores ... why must every core draw
a logo? Currently each core draws the logo, and on a system with more
than 4 cores, I think this looks not really good ...
Hmm... I do not really have a lot experience in this area ... but why
is the logo only drawed when booting? Is there nothing like a "redraw"
of it?
Maybe others have here a good idea?
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:17:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55641E1E.9010607@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556418A9.8010603@ti.com>
Hello Tomi,
Am 26.05.2015 08:54, schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
>
>
> On 26/05/15 06:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>>> Without locking, the initmem may be freed while fb_find_logo() is
>>> running.
>>
>> Yes, you are right, that must be added ... but has such a change a
>> chance to go in mainline?
>
> I don't know. To be honest, this whole thing feels a bit like hackery. I
Full Ack ;-)
> think initdata should only be accessed from initcalls, never asynchronously.
Yes.
>> BTW: Could this not be currently a problem on multicore systems?
>> If lets say core 2 just draws the logo, another core 1 calls
>> fb_logo_late_init() and later core 1 free_initmem(), while the core 2
>> still draws it?
>
> Yes, I think so...
>
> So, maybe it would be better to not even try to go forward with the
> current approach. Two approaches come to my mind:
>
> 1) Keep the logos in the memory, and don't even try to free them. I
> don't know many bytes they are in total, though.
That was my first thought too... but we waste memory ... not nice.
> 2) Make a copy of the logos to a kmalloced area at some early boot
> stage. Then manually free the logos at some point (after the first
> access to the logos? after a certain time (urgh...)?).
maybe yes ... or ...
3) wait for all cores, until they reached SYSTEM_FREEING_MEM and
free init mem only than? But are all cores used/started when booting?
4) draw only one logo even on multicores ... why must every core draw
a logo? Currently each core draws the logo, and on a system with more
than 4 cores, I think this looks not really good ...
Hmm... I do not really have a lot experience in this area ... but why
is the logo only drawed when booting? Is there nothing like a "redraw"
of it?
Maybe others have here a good idea?
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 7:09 [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed Heiko Schocher
2015-05-06 7:09 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-25 5:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-25 5:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 3:56 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 3:56 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 6:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 6:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 7:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 7:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 7:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:29 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:29 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:17 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2015-05-26 7:17 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55641E1E.9010607@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.