preparing v0.80.11

preparing v0.80.11

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 256 bytes --]

Hi Nathan,

Although v0.80.10 is not out yet, the odds of a discovering a problem that would require an additional backport are low. I think you can start with v0.80.11 without further delay :-)

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Nathan Cutler]

> Although v0.80.10 is not out yet, the odds of a discovering a problem that would require an additional backport are low. I think you can start with v0.80.11 without further delay :-)

As soon as I get over the flu :-(

Nathan

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Loic:

The first round of 0.80.11 backports, including all trivial backports 
(where "trivial" is defined as those I was able to do by myself without 
help), is now ready for integration testing in the "firefly-backports" 
branch of the SUSE fork:

https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commits/firefly-backports

The non-trivial backports (on which I hereby solicit help) are:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11699 Objecter: resend linger ops on split
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11700 make the all osd/filestore thread 
pool suicide timeouts separately configurable
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11704 erasure-code: misalignment
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11720 rgw deleting S3 objects leaves 
__shadow_ objects behind

Nathan

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1068 bytes --]

Hi Nathan,

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports has been reset with https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commits/firefly-backports and http://ceph.com/gitbuilder.cgi are building it.

Cheers

On 26/05/2015 22:28, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Loic:
> 
> The first round of 0.80.11 backports, including all trivial backports (where "trivial" is defined as those I was able to do by myself without help), is now ready for integration testing in the "firefly-backports" branch of the SUSE fork:
> 
> https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commits/firefly-backports
> 
> The non-trivial backports (on which I hereby solicit help) are:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11699 Objecter: resend linger ops on split
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11700 make the all osd/filestore thread pool suicide timeouts separately configurable
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11704 erasure-code: misalignment
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11720 rgw deleting S3 objects leaves __shadow_ objects behind
> 
> Nathan

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Wido den Hollander]

On 05/26/2015 10:28 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Loic:
> 
> The first round of 0.80.11 backports, including all trivial backports
> (where "trivial" is defined as those I was able to do by myself without
> help), is now ready for integration testing in the "firefly-backports"
> branch of the SUSE fork:
> 

Would it be possible to backport this as well to 0.80.11:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9792#change-46498

And I think this commit would be the easiest to backport:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/6b982e4cc00f9f201d7fbffa0282f8f3295f2309

This way we add a simple safeguard against pool removal into Firefly as
well.

Wido

> https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commits/firefly-backports
> 
> The non-trivial backports (on which I hereby solicit help) are:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11699 Objecter: resend linger ops on split
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11700 make the all osd/filestore thread
> pool suicide timeouts separately configurable
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11704 erasure-code: misalignment
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11720 rgw deleting S3 objects leaves
> __shadow_ objects behind
> 
> Nathan
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant

Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Nathan Cutler]

> Would it be possible to backport this as well to 0.80.11:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9792#change-46498
>
> And I think this commit would be the easiest to backport:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/6b982e4cc00f9f201d7fbffa0282f8f3295f2309
>
> This way we add a simple safeguard against pool removal into Firefly as
> well.

Hi Wido:

Thanks for this suggestion. I have cherry-picked the commit you quoted 
and it will soon be in firefly-backports. The backport tracker issue is:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11801

Regards,
Nathan

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Wido den Hollander]

On 05/26/2015 10:28 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Loic:
> 
> The first round of 0.80.11 backports, including all trivial backports
> (where "trivial" is defined as those I was able to do by myself without
> help), is now ready for integration testing in the "firefly-backports"
> branch of the SUSE fork:
> 
> https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commits/firefly-backports
> 
> The non-trivial backports (on which I hereby solicit help) are:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11699 Objecter: resend linger ops on split
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11700 make the all osd/filestore thread
> pool suicide timeouts separately configurable
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11704 erasure-code: misalignment
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11720 rgw deleting S3 objects leaves
> __shadow_ objects behind
> 

Could I also ask for this one to be backported?

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4844

It breaks a couple of setups I know of. It's not in master yet, but it's
a very trivial fix.

> Nathan
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant

Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on

Re: preparing v0.80.11

[Nathan Cutler]

> Could I also ask for this one to be backported?
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4844
>
> It breaks a couple of setups I know of. It's not in master yet, but it's
> a very trivial fix.

Hi Wido:

firefly backport: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4861
hammer backport: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4862

Please take a look.

Nathan