All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <gqJiang@suse.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: remove unnecessary error check
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:14:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5580D81F.3090308@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150611161843.GA20918@redhat.com>

Hi David,

David Teigland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:47:28PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>   
>> Do you consider take the following clean up? If yes, I will send a
>> formal patch, otherwise pls ignore it.
>>     
>
> On first glance, the old and new code do not appear to do the same thing,
> so let's leave it as it is.
>
>   
>> -       to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
>>     
Sorry, seems it is the only different thing, if combines previous change
with below modification, then the behavior is same.

@@ -3644,7 +3644,10 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct
dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
        struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
        int to_nodeid, error;
 
-       to_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;
+       if (mstype == DLM_MSG_LOOKUP)
+               to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
+       else
+               to_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;

And for create_message, the second parameter (lkb) is not effective to
create three type msgs (REQUEST/LOOKUP/REMOVE).

Thanks,
Guoqing



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guoqing Jiang <gqJiang@suse.com>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>,
	ccaulfie@redhat.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: remove unnecessary error check
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:14:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5580D81F.3090308@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150611161843.GA20918@redhat.com>

Hi David,

David Teigland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:47:28PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>   
>> Do you consider take the following clean up? If yes, I will send a
>> formal patch, otherwise pls ignore it.
>>     
>
> On first glance, the old and new code do not appear to do the same thing,
> so let's leave it as it is.
>
>   
>> -       to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
>>     
Sorry, seems it is the only different thing, if combines previous change
with below modification, then the behavior is same.

@@ -3644,7 +3644,10 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct
dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
        struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
        int to_nodeid, error;
 
-       to_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;
+       if (mstype == DLM_MSG_LOOKUP)
+               to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
+       else
+               to_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;

And for create_message, the second parameter (lkb) is not effective to
create three type msgs (REQUEST/LOOKUP/REMOVE).

Thanks,
Guoqing

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-09  9:46 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: remove unnecessary error check Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-09  9:46 ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-09 12:09 ` [Cluster-devel] " Bob Peterson
2015-06-09 12:09   ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-10  2:39   ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-10  2:39     ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-10  2:50     ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-10  2:50       ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-10  3:10       ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-10  3:10         ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-10 12:26         ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-10 12:26           ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-11  2:39           ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-11  2:39             ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-10 15:24         ` David Teigland
2015-06-10 15:24           ` David Teigland
2015-06-11  9:47           ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-11  9:47             ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-06-11 16:18             ` David Teigland
2015-06-11 16:18               ` David Teigland
2015-06-17  2:14               ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2015-06-17  2:14                 ` Guoqing Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5580D81F.3090308@suse.com \
    --to=gqjiang@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.