* [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2015-06-17 6:56 kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 6:56 ` [PATCH next] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next':: aat1290_intensity_to_brightness() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 15:21 ` [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? Jacek Anaszewski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-06-17 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Wu
Cc: kbuild-all, Michael Ellerman, Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski,
linux-leds, linux-kernel
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: ca3cfaa9e7db530b14e4a2d98a9310130152fdb8
commit: 1da60a5e7198c716990ac6fa508e45e27e7067c0 [11893/11947] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next'
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 1da60a5e7198c716990ac6fa508e45e27e7067c0
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:334:5: sparse: symbol 'init_mm_current_scale' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:412:5: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_brightness_to_intensity' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH next] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next':: aat1290_intensity_to_brightness() can be static
2015-06-17 6:56 [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2015-06-17 6:56 ` kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 15:21 ` [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? Jacek Anaszewski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-06-17 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Wu
Cc: kbuild-all, Michael Ellerman, Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski,
linux-leds, linux-kernel
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
leds-aat1290.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c
index 1ac525b4..fd7c25f 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static void aat1290_init_flash_timeout(struct aat1290_led *led,
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS)
-enum led_brightness aat1290_intensity_to_brightness(
+static enum led_brightness aat1290_intensity_to_brightness(
struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash,
s32 intensity)
{
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ enum led_brightness aat1290_intensity_to_brightness(
return 1;
}
-s32 aat1290_brightness_to_intensity(struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash,
+static s32 aat1290_brightness_to_intensity(struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash,
enum led_brightness brightness)
{
struct led_classdev_flash *fled_cdev = v4l2_flash->fled_cdev;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static?
2015-06-17 6:56 [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 6:56 ` [PATCH next] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next':: aat1290_intensity_to_brightness() can be static kbuild test robot
@ 2015-06-17 15:21 ` Jacek Anaszewski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacek Anaszewski @ 2015-06-17 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Wu; +Cc: Michael Ellerman, Richard Purdie, linux-leds, linux-kernel
On 06/17/2015 08:56 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: ca3cfaa9e7db530b14e4a2d98a9310130152fdb8
> commit: 1da60a5e7198c716990ac6fa508e45e27e7067c0 [11893/11947] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next'
> reproduce:
> # apt-get install sparse
> git checkout 1da60a5e7198c716990ac6fa508e45e27e7067c0
> make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
> drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:334:5: sparse: symbol 'init_mm_current_scale' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:412:5: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_brightness_to_intensity' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
These should be statics. I'll send fixed patches tomorrow.
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-17 15:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-17 6:56 [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 6:56 ` [PATCH next] Merge remote-tracking branch 'leds/for-next':: aat1290_intensity_to_brightness() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-06-17 15:21 ` [next:master 11893/11947] drivers/leds/leds-aat1290.c:397:21: sparse: symbol 'aat1290_intensity_to_brightness' was not declared. Should it be static? Jacek Anaszewski
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.