From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:01:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559F6DB6.9010000@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559F6B3C.8080908@rock-chips.com>
On 10.07.2015 15:50, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015年07月10日 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
>> will set it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> @@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = {
>> .remove = ps8622_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "ps8622",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ps8622_devices,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = {
>> .remove = ptn3460_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "nxp,ptn3460",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ptn3460_match,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver
>> rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
>> .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
>> .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> But rockchip drm is platform driver not i2c_driver, why remove its .owner ?
Oh, indeed. Thanks for spotting this.
The 'owner' is set by core for platform drivers as well. Most platform
drivers were already converted (I think by Wolfram Sang). I extended
existing coccinelle script to fix also i2c_drivers and sometimes did not
notice that it was platform_driver.
I can split it into two different patches. Would that be ok?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:01:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559F6DB6.9010000@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559F6B3C.8080908@rock-chips.com>
On 10.07.2015 15:50, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015?07?10? 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
>> will set it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> @@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = {
>> .remove = ps8622_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "ps8622",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ps8622_devices,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = {
>> .remove = ptn3460_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "nxp,ptn3460",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ptn3460_match,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver
>> rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
>> .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
>> .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> But rockchip drm is platform driver not i2c_driver, why remove its .owner ?
Oh, indeed. Thanks for spotting this.
The 'owner' is set by core for platform drivers as well. Most platform
drivers were already converted (I think by Wolfram Sang). I extended
existing coccinelle script to fix also i2c_drivers and sometimes did not
notice that it was platform_driver.
I can split it into two different patches. Would that be ok?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:01:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559F6DB6.9010000@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559F6B3C.8080908@rock-chips.com>
On 10.07.2015 15:50, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015年07月10日 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
>> will set it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
>> @@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = {
>> .remove = ps8622_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "ps8622",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ps8622_devices,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
>> @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = {
>> .remove = ptn3460_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "nxp,ptn3460",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ptn3460_match,
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver
>> rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
>> .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
>> .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> But rockchip drm is platform driver not i2c_driver, why remove its .owner ?
Oh, indeed. Thanks for spotting this.
The 'owner' is set by core for platform drivers as well. Most platform
drivers were already converted (I think by Wolfram Sang). I extended
existing coccinelle script to fix also i2c_drivers and sometimes did not
notice that it was platform_driver.
I can split it into two different patches. Would that be ok?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 5:36 [PATCH] Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver (and platform left-overs) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 5:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 5:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH] drm: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 5:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 5:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 6:50 ` Mark yao
2015-07-10 6:50 ` Mark yao
2015-07-10 6:50 ` Mark yao
2015-07-10 7:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-07-10 7:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 7:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 7:11 ` Mark yao
2015-07-10 7:11 ` Mark yao
2015-07-10 7:11 ` Mark yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559F6DB6.9010000@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.