From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1505261230020.11225@eddie.linux-mips.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2707 bytes --]
On 26/05/15 12:58, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>>> Add a MIPS specific SysRq operation to dump the TLB entries on all CPUs,
>>> using the 'x' trigger key.
>>
>> Thought: Would it make sense to split apart the data such that one SysRq key
>> dumps the CP0 registers of all CPUs, and another dumps the TLB info?
>
> That would be a large separate project, probing a CPU for its implemented
> CP0 registers is a complex matter.
>
> I did it for GDB and a bare-iron debug stub a few years ago and back then
> there were IIRC 53 register subsets already defined for MIPS architecture
> processors, wired to various, sometimes overlapping feature bits of CP0
> Config registers, and now there are more. Plus legacy processors require
> fixed register maps according to CP0.PRId.
>
> James, I think what you proposed is good enough for TLB diagnostics (I'm
> not sure if dumping EntryLo0 and EntryLo1 registers has any use, but it
> surely does not hurt either).
>
>>> + pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
>>> + pr_info("Index : %0x\n", read_c0_index());
>>> + pr_info("Pagemask: %0x\n", read_c0_pagemask());
>>> + pr_info("EntryHi : %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entryhi());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo0: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo0());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo1: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo1());
>>> + pr_info("Wired : %0x\n", read_c0_wired());
>>> + pr_info("Pagegrain: %0x\n", read_c0_pagegrain());
>
> Please capitalise these consistently: PageMask and PageGrain.
>
>> The older CPUs, like the R10000 don't have a PageGrain register I believe (at
>> least R10K doesn't), Does that need to be stuffed behind a conditional? Also,
>> R10K (and newer?) CPUs have a FrameMask CP0 register ($21). Linux currently
>> scribbles a 0 to the writable bits, though, so I'm not sure if it matters.
>
> First of all I suggest that this part is split off into separate small
> helper functions within dump_tlb.c and r3k_dump_tlb.c. This code is not
> performance-critical, so the overhead of an extra function call isn't of
> a concern.
>
> Then R3k processors have Index, EntryHi and EntryLo (rather than
> EntryLo0) registers only; some Toshiba processors have Wired too (cf.
> `r3k_have_wired_reg').
>
> And for the R4k-style TLB the PageGrain register does need to be probed
> for. I think including FrameMask would be good too, that shouldn't be
> difficult (switch on `current_cpu_type'?).
Thanks for all the feedback Joshua and Maciej, and sorry for the delay
getting back to this. I think I've addressed it all now, so I'll submit
a second patchset soon.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150714092729.5TzzanSamxgmhOyk0I7-deZVGr-RZzmS5c4Rcb-MGgU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1505261230020.11225@eddie.linux-mips.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2707 bytes --]
On 26/05/15 12:58, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>>> Add a MIPS specific SysRq operation to dump the TLB entries on all CPUs,
>>> using the 'x' trigger key.
>>
>> Thought: Would it make sense to split apart the data such that one SysRq key
>> dumps the CP0 registers of all CPUs, and another dumps the TLB info?
>
> That would be a large separate project, probing a CPU for its implemented
> CP0 registers is a complex matter.
>
> I did it for GDB and a bare-iron debug stub a few years ago and back then
> there were IIRC 53 register subsets already defined for MIPS architecture
> processors, wired to various, sometimes overlapping feature bits of CP0
> Config registers, and now there are more. Plus legacy processors require
> fixed register maps according to CP0.PRId.
>
> James, I think what you proposed is good enough for TLB diagnostics (I'm
> not sure if dumping EntryLo0 and EntryLo1 registers has any use, but it
> surely does not hurt either).
>
>>> + pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
>>> + pr_info("Index : %0x\n", read_c0_index());
>>> + pr_info("Pagemask: %0x\n", read_c0_pagemask());
>>> + pr_info("EntryHi : %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entryhi());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo0: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo0());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo1: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo1());
>>> + pr_info("Wired : %0x\n", read_c0_wired());
>>> + pr_info("Pagegrain: %0x\n", read_c0_pagegrain());
>
> Please capitalise these consistently: PageMask and PageGrain.
>
>> The older CPUs, like the R10000 don't have a PageGrain register I believe (at
>> least R10K doesn't), Does that need to be stuffed behind a conditional? Also,
>> R10K (and newer?) CPUs have a FrameMask CP0 register ($21). Linux currently
>> scribbles a 0 to the writable bits, though, so I'm not sure if it matters.
>
> First of all I suggest that this part is split off into separate small
> helper functions within dump_tlb.c and r3k_dump_tlb.c. This code is not
> performance-critical, so the overhead of an extra function call isn't of
> a concern.
>
> Then R3k processors have Index, EntryHi and EntryLo (rather than
> EntryLo0) registers only; some Toshiba processors have Wired too (cf.
> `r3k_have_wired_reg').
>
> And for the R4k-style TLB the PageGrain register does need to be probed
> for. I think including FrameMask would be good too, that shouldn't be
> difficult (switch on `current_cpu_type'?).
Thanks for all the feedback Joshua and Maciej, and sorry for the delay
getting back to this. I think I've addressed it all now, so I'll submit
a second patchset soon.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 8:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] MIPS: dump_tlb improvements James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-24 21:21 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-26 11:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-27 13:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-07-14 9:27 ` James Hogan [this message]
2015-07-14 9:27 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] MIPS: hazards: Add hazard macros for tlb read James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-26 12:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-26 13:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-26 13:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] MIPS: mipsregs.h: Add EntryLo bit definitions James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-28 23:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Use tlbr hazard macros James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Refactor TLB matching James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Make use of EntryLo bit definitions James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take global bit into account James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take EHINV " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take RI/XI bits " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take XPA " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.