From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:12:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A895AC.8070101@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716213429.GE1602@sirena.org.uk>
On Friday 17 July 2015 03:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:46:57PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with
>> additional feature enhancements, like,
>> - 88pm860 had additional BUCK regulator (BUCK6 and BUCK1B)
>> - Additional LDO (LDO20)
>> - different voltage and current capability
>
> ...and reverted since this doesn't build as the kbuild test robot
> reported. :(
>
How do you suggest to handle dependency between MFD patch and this
patch?
Can you merge this into regulator tree?
Link to MFD - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704
Thanks,
Vaibhav
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:12:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A895AC.8070101@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716213429.GE1602@sirena.org.uk>
On Friday 17 July 2015 03:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:46:57PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with
>> additional feature enhancements, like,
>> - 88pm860 had additional BUCK regulator (BUCK6 and BUCK1B)
>> - Additional LDO (LDO20)
>> - different voltage and current capability
>
> ...and reverted since this doesn't build as the kbuild test robot
> reported. :(
>
How do you suggest to handle dependency between MFD patch and this
patch?
Can you merge this into regulator tree?
Link to MFD - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704
Thanks,
Vaibhav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 18:16 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: 88pm800: Fix indentation of assignments of data structures Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: 88pm800: Update driver to use devm_regulator_register fn Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: 88pm800: Use regulator_nodes/of_match in the descriptor Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 21:34 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-16 21:34 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-17 5:42 ` Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-07-17 5:42 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-17 11:17 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-17 11:17 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-17 12:43 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-17 12:43 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-20 7:30 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-20 7:30 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-20 12:01 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-20 12:01 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 9:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-21 9:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-21 11:15 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:15 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 15:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-21 15:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-21 15:19 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 15:19 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 15:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-21 15:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-16 18:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1 Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 18:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-16 20:32 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-16 20:32 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-17 5:38 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-17 5:38 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A895AC.8070101@linaro.org \
--to=vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.