From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:54:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55ACB733.2080609@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A945DF.3@codeaurora.org>
On 17/07/15 19:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 04:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
>>
>> determine_rate change shouldn't affect SCPI clock driver but I remember
>> seeing round_rate change too on the list which returns value using the
>> argument from Boris. Is that planned for v4.3 ? I would need the stable
>> branch from this clk_hw_set_rate_range if you decide to push. Let me
>> know your preferences. I will post the updated version of the patch
>> accordingly.
>>
>
> We're not going to change round_rate() so it sounds like you don't need
> a stable branch. But you would need this new consumer API. So you still
> need a branch right?
>
I am fine either way. If no one else need the stable branch to be shared
with arm-soc, I prefer to use clock consumer API for now to avoid all
the troubles to you guys and switch to provider API later. I will post
it once the both this driver and that provider API is merged, if that's
fine with you ?
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:54:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55ACB733.2080609@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A945DF.3@codeaurora.org>
On 17/07/15 19:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 04:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
>>
>> determine_rate change shouldn't affect SCPI clock driver but I remember
>> seeing round_rate change too on the list which returns value using the
>> argument from Boris. Is that planned for v4.3 ? I would need the stable
>> branch from this clk_hw_set_rate_range if you decide to push. Let me
>> know your preferences. I will post the updated version of the patch
>> accordingly.
>>
>
> We're not going to change round_rate() so it sounds like you don't need
> a stable branch. But you would need this new consumer API. So you still
> need a branch right?
>
I am fine either way. If no one else need the stable branch to be shared
with arm-soc, I prefer to use clock consumer API for now to avoid all
the troubles to you guys and switch to provider API later. I will post
it once the both this driver and that provider API is merged, if that's
fine with you ?
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 10:39 [PATCH v4 0/8] ARM64: juno: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] Documentation: add DT binding for ARM System Control and Power Interface(SCPI) protocol Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-08 13:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-08 13:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 8:43 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 8:43 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 8:43 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 9:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 9:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-22 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-22 15:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 15:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 15:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 16:23 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-22 16:23 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] firmware: add support " Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-11 11:54 ` Jassi Brar
2015-06-11 11:54 ` Jassi Brar
2015-06-11 13:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-11 13:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-02 17:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-02 17:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-03 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 16:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 16:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-06 19:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-06 19:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-07 16:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-07 16:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-08 1:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-08 1:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-16 16:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-16 16:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-16 19:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-16 19:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-17 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-17 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-17 18:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-17 18:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-20 8:54 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-07-20 8:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-21 18:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 18:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-22 14:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 14:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64: dts: add SRAM, MHU mailbox and SCPI support on Juno Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 13:51 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-06-08 13:51 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-06-08 14:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 14:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 14:35 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-06-08 14:35 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 13:28 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 13:28 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 15:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 15:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 16:06 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 16:06 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 16:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 16:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64: dts: add CPU topology " Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 13:31 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 13:31 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-06-08 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64: dts: add clock support for all the cpus Sudeep Holla
2015-06-08 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 13:32 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-07-22 13:32 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55ACB733.2080609@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.