Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor)

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>]

On 07/20/2015 01:54 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/07/15 19:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 04:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> determine_rate change shouldn't affect SCPI clock driver but I remember
>>> seeing round_rate change too on the list which returns value using the
>>> argument from Boris. Is that planned for v4.3 ? I would need the stable
>>> branch from this clk_hw_set_rate_range if you decide to push. Let me
>>> know your preferences. I will post the updated version of the patch
>>> accordingly.
>>>
>>
>> We're not going to change round_rate() so it sounds like you don't need
>> a stable branch. But you would need this new consumer API. So you still
>> need a branch right?
>>
>
> I am fine either way. If no one else need the stable branch to be shared
> with arm-soc, I prefer to use clock consumer API for now to avoid all
> the troubles to you guys and switch to provider API later. I will post
> it once the both this driver and that provider API is merged, if that's
> fine with you ?

Ok. Sounds fine as long as we don't forget.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project