All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fupan <fupan.li-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Greg KH
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	fupanli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Luis Henriques
	<luis.henriques-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>,
	stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:22:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BACDD9.6020505@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150730165943.GD5515-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On 07/31/2015 12:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:45:44PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul, at 09:31:02AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Why isn't this an issue in newer kernel releases?  Did this already get
>>> fixed by some other patch?  If so, why can't we just take that patch?
>>> If not, why not?
>>   
>> The commit 35d5134b7d5a ("x86/efi: Correct EFI boot stub use of
>> code32_start") only exists in the stable trees in that form because
>> there was quite a lot of churn in that area in Linus tree that didn't
>> get backported.
>>
>> So the code in Linus' tree never looked like the code in the stable does
>> right now.
>>
>>> I _REALLY_ don't like taking patches that are not already in Linus's
>>> tree, as it almost always turns out to be the wrong solution.
>> Yeah, I think this issue verifies that.
> Ugh, what a mess.  Ok, if you get something that works and is in a
> format that I can apply it, please resend it properly so that we can do
> so.
Hi, Matt

Will you take care of this patch or I send a V2?

Thanks!

Fupan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fupan <fupan.li@windriver.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <fupanli@gmail.com>,
	<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:22:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BACDD9.6020505@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150730165943.GD5515@kroah.com>

On 07/31/2015 12:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:45:44PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul, at 09:31:02AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Why isn't this an issue in newer kernel releases?  Did this already get
>>> fixed by some other patch?  If so, why can't we just take that patch?
>>> If not, why not?
>>   
>> The commit 35d5134b7d5a ("x86/efi: Correct EFI boot stub use of
>> code32_start") only exists in the stable trees in that form because
>> there was quite a lot of churn in that area in Linus tree that didn't
>> get backported.
>>
>> So the code in Linus' tree never looked like the code in the stable does
>> right now.
>>
>>> I _REALLY_ don't like taking patches that are not already in Linus's
>>> tree, as it almost always turns out to be the wrong solution.
>> Yeah, I think this issue verifies that.
> Ugh, what a mess.  Ok, if you get something that works and is in a
> format that I can apply it, please resend it properly so that we can do
> so.
Hi, Matt

Will you take care of this patch or I send a V2?

Thanks!

Fupan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-28 10:21 [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem fupan.li
2015-07-28 15:15 ` Greg KH
2015-07-30 15:04 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 16:31   ` Greg KH
     [not found]     ` <20150730163102.GA19943-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-30 16:45       ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 16:45         ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 16:59         ` Greg KH
     [not found]           ` <20150730165943.GD5515-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-31  1:22             ` fupan [this message]
2015-07-31  1:22               ` fupan
2015-07-31 12:05               ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-31 12:21                 ` Luis Henriques
2015-07-31 12:21                   ` Luis Henriques
2015-08-03  1:38                   ` fupan
2015-08-03  1:38                     ` fupan
2015-08-03  1:38                     ` fupan
2015-08-03  2:12                 ` fupan
2015-08-03  2:12                   ` fupan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55BACDD9.6020505@windriver.com \
    --to=fupan.li-cwa4wttnnzf54taoqtywwq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fupanli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=luis.henriques-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.