All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
To: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/16] ieee820154: 6lowpan: dispatch evaluation rework
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:51:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB4135.4070103@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438583035-6287-10-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>

Hello.

On 03/08/15 08:23, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch complete reworks the evaluation of 6lowpan dispatch value by
> introducing several different handlers for each dispatch value. This
> patch also fixes a bug to re-evaluate the dispatch value after reassmble
> while fragmentation. Currently we always assume that we have an IPHC
> header there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring<alex.aring@gmail.com>
> ---
>   net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> index bf6e857..c7afd4a 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> @@ -15,12 +15,42 @@
>   
>   #include "6lowpan_i.h"
>   
> +typedef unsigned __bitwise__ lowpan_rx_result;
> +#define RX_CONTINUE		((__force lowpan_rx_result) 0u)
> +#define RX_DROP_UNUSABLE	((__force lowpan_rx_result) 1u)
> +#define RX_DROP			((__force lowpan_rx_result) 2u)
> +#define RX_QUEUED		((__force lowpan_rx_result) 3u)
> +
> +static int
> +lowpan_rx_handlers_result(struct sk_buff *skb, lowpan_rx_result res)
> +{
> +	switch (res) {
> +	/* nobody cared about this packet */
> +	case RX_CONTINUE:
> +	case RX_DROP_UNUSABLE:
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +	case RX_DROP:
> +		return NET_RX_DROP;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
>   static int lowpan_give_skb_to_device(struct sk_buff *skb)
>   {
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>   	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>   
> -	return netif_rx(skb);
> +	ret = netif_rx(skb);
> +	/* kfree_skb handled by netif_rx, so RX_DROP on failure */
> +	if (ret == NET_RX_SUCCESS)
> +		return RX_QUEUED;
> +	else
> +		return RX_DROP;
>   }
>   
>   static int
> @@ -54,69 +84,86 @@ iphc_decompress(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct ieee802154_hdr *hdr)
>   					IEEE802154_ADDR_LEN, iphc0, iphc1);
>   }
>   
> -static int lowpan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *wdev,
> -		      struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_wdev)
> +static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	if (skb->data[0] != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6)
> +		return RX_CONTINUE;
> +
> +	/* Pull off the 1-byte of 6lowpan header. */
> +	skb_pull(skb, 1);
> +	return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> +}
> +
> +static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_frag(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if ((skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1 &&
> +	    (skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN)
> +		return RX_CONTINUE;
> +
> +	ret = lowpan_frag_rcv(skb, skb->data[0] & 0xe0);

You fix this mask in patch 11 later one. Maybe its worth merging this 
fix in here? At least using 0xf8 as you only introduce the 
LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG_MASK in patch 10.

Nothing to problematic but I always wonder about such things when I see 
a fix later in a series which was introduced/already touched earlier in 
the series.
> +	if (ret == 1)
> +		return RX_CONTINUE;
> +
> +	/* packet is dropped and putted into the frag bucket only */

s/putted/put/

> +	return RX_DROP;
> +}
> +
> +static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_iphc(struct sk_buff *skb)
>   {
> -	struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;
>   	int ret;
> +	struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;
> +
> +	if ((skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC)

All this use of 0xe0 is a bit annoying as the se magic value misses a 
real meaning. Luckily I have just seen that you clean this up in the 
next patch and it only is here as you broke up the code below into 
pieces. Just keep it as patch 10 fixes this.

> +		return RX_CONTINUE;
> +
> +	if (ieee802154_hdr_peek_addrs(skb, &hdr) < 0)
> +		return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
> +
> +	ret = iphc_decompress(skb, &hdr);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
> +
> +	return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> +}
> +
> +int lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	lowpan_rx_result res;
> +
> +#define CALL_RXH(rxh)			\
> +	do {				\
> +		res = rxh(skb);		\
> +		if (res != RX_CONTINUE)	\
> +			goto rxh_next;	\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +	/* frag at first, because it contains dispatch value again */
> +	CALL_RXH(lowpan_rx_h_frag);
>   
> +	/* likely at first */
> +	CALL_RXH(lowpan_rx_h_iphc);
> +	CALL_RXH(lowpan_rx_h_ipv6);
> +
> +rxh_next:
> +	return lowpan_rx_handlers_result(skb, res);
> +#undef CALL_RXH
> +}
> +
> +static int lowpan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *wdev,
> +		      struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_wdev)
> +{
>   	if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST ||
>   	    wdev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154)
> -		goto drop;
> +		return NET_RX_DROP;
>   
>   	skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	if (!skb)
> -		goto drop;
> -
> -	if (ieee802154_hdr_peek_addrs(skb, &hdr) < 0)
> -		goto drop_skb;
> +		return NET_RX_DROP;
>   
>   	skb->dev = wdev->ieee802154_ptr->lowpan_dev;
> -
> -	/* check that it's our buffer */
> -	if (skb->data[0] == LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6) {
> -		/* Pull off the 1-byte of 6lowpan header. */
> -		skb_pull(skb, 1);
> -		return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> -	} else {
> -		switch (skb->data[0] & 0xe0) {
> -		case LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC:	/* ipv6 datagram */
> -			ret = iphc_decompress(skb, &hdr);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				goto drop_skb;
> -
> -			return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> -		case LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1:	/* first fragment header */
> -			ret = lowpan_frag_rcv(skb, LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1);
> -			if (ret == 1) {
> -				ret = iphc_decompress(skb, &hdr);
> -				if (ret < 0)
> -					goto drop_skb;
> -
> -				return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> -			}
> -
> -			return NET_RX_DROP;
> -		case LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN:	/* next fragments headers */
> -			ret = lowpan_frag_rcv(skb, LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN);
> -			if (ret == 1) {
> -				ret = iphc_decompress(skb, &hdr);
> -				if (ret < 0)
> -					goto drop_skb;
> -
> -				return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> -			}
> -
> -			return NET_RX_DROP;
> -		default:
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -drop_skb:
> -	kfree_skb(skb);
> -drop:
> -	return NET_RX_DROP;
> +	return lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers(skb);
>   }
>   
>   static struct packet_type lowpan_packet_type = {

Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>

regards
Stefan Schmidt

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-03  6:23 [RFC 00/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup and rework dispatch evaluation Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 01/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change dev vars to wdev and ldev Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  8:49   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 02/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove set to zero Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  8:49   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 03/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  8:49   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 04/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove check on wdev is running Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  8:49   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-15 11:50   ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 05/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup pull of iphc bytes Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  9:03   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 06/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: trivial checks at first Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  9:04   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12  9:21     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-15  9:15   ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 07/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change skb->dev earlier Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  9:13   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 08/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change frag return value handling Alexander Aring
2015-08-12  9:14   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12  9:26     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 09/16] ieee820154: 6lowpan: dispatch evaluation rework Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51   ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 10/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add dispatch evalualtion helpers Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 13:20     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:48       ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 13:55         ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 11/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix fragmentation dispatch mask Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 12/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add generic lowpan header check Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 13/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add handler for all dispatch values Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 14/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add check for reserved dispatch Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 20:17     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 15/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: check on valid 802.15.4 frame Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 13:54     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03  6:23 ` [RFC 16/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove packet type to host Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12  8:15 ` [RFC 00/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup and rework dispatch evaluation Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13  9:10   ` Stefan Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CB4135.4070103@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.