From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
To: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add dispatch evalualtion helpers
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:51:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB413E.4020304@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438583035-6287-11-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>
Hello.
typo in subject. s/evalualtion/evaluation/
On 03/08/15 08:23, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch introduce some static inline function for checking the right
> dispatch value. This also fixes an bug to detect the right fragmentation
> dispatch value, we currently use "0xe0" as masking the fragmentation
> dispatch. Correct is "0xf8" as mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring<alex.aring@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/6lowpan.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> net/ieee802154/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h | 3 +++
> net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/6lowpan.h b/include/net/6lowpan.h
> index e16763f..073c791 100644
> --- a/include/net/6lowpan.h
> +++ b/include/net/6lowpan.h
> @@ -126,11 +126,19 @@
> (((a)[6]) == 0xFF) && \
> (((a)[7]) == 0xFF))
>
> -#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6 0x41 /* 01000001 = 65 */
> -#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_HC1 0x42 /* 01000010 = 66 */
> -#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC 0x60 /* 011xxxxx = ... */
> -#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1 0xc0 /* 11000xxx */
> -#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN 0xe0 /* 11100xxx */
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6 0x41 /* 01000001 = 65 */
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC 0x60 /* 011xxxxx = ... */
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC_MASK 0xe0
> +
> +static inline bool lowpan_is_ipv6(u8 dispatch)
> +{
> + return dispatch == LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool lowpan_is_iphc(u8 dispatch)
> +{
> + return (dispatch & LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC_MASK) == LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC;
> +}
>
> #define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_MASK 0xf8 /* 11111000 */
>
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h
> index d62046e..e009a4a 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
> #include <net/inet_frag.h>
> #include <net/6lowpan.h>
>
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1 0xc0
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN 0xe0
> +
> struct lowpan_create_arg {
> u16 tag;
> u16 d_size;
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> index c7afd4a..b0066b7 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ typedef unsigned __bitwise__ lowpan_rx_result;
> #define RX_DROP ((__force lowpan_rx_result) 2u)
> #define RX_QUEUED ((__force lowpan_rx_result) 3u)
>
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FIRST 0xc0
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG_MASK 0xf8
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC_MASK 0xe0
> +
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_NALP 0x00
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_HC1 0x42
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_BC0 0x50
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_ESC 0x7f
> +#define LOWPAN_DISPATCH_MESH 0x80
> +
Any specific reason you moved the *_HC1 define here (same for the *_FRAG
defines above)?
I would think having them all in 6lowpan.h would make most sense. You
might need them only in this file for now but later one maybe in another
file. It could be personal taste but having them all in one place should
be easier. imho.
> static int
> lowpan_rx_handlers_result(struct sk_buff *skb, lowpan_rx_result res)
> {
> @@ -86,7 +96,7 @@ iphc_decompress(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct ieee802154_hdr *hdr)
>
> static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - if (skb->data[0] != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPV6)
> + if (!lowpan_is_ipv6(*skb_network_header(skb)))
> return RX_CONTINUE;
>
> /* Pull off the 1-byte of 6lowpan header. */
> @@ -94,15 +104,25 @@ static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb)
> return lowpan_give_skb_to_device(skb);
> }
>
> +static inline bool lowpan_is_frag1(u8 dispatch)
> +{
> + return (dispatch & LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG_MASK) == LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool lowpan_is_fragn(u8 dispatch)
> +{
> + return (dispatch & LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG_MASK) == LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN;
> +}
> +
> static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_frag(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if ((skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAG1 &&
> - (skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_FRAGN)
> + if (!(lowpan_is_frag1(*skb_network_header(skb)) ||
> + lowpan_is_fragn(*skb_network_header(skb))))
> return RX_CONTINUE;
>
> - ret = lowpan_frag_rcv(skb, skb->data[0] & 0xe0);
> + ret = lowpan_frag_rcv(skb, *skb_network_header(skb) & 0xe0);
> if (ret == 1)
> return RX_CONTINUE;
>
> @@ -115,7 +135,7 @@ static lowpan_rx_result lowpan_rx_h_iphc(struct sk_buff *skb)
> int ret;
> struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;
>
> - if ((skb->data[0] & 0xe0) != LOWPAN_DISPATCH_IPHC)
> + if (!lowpan_is_iphc(*skb_network_header(skb)))
> return RX_CONTINUE;
>
> if (ieee802154_hdr_peek_addrs(skb, &hdr) < 0)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
regards
Stefan Schmidt
6lowpan.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 6:23 [RFC 00/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup and rework dispatch evaluation Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 01/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change dev vars to wdev and ldev Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 8:49 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 02/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove set to zero Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 8:49 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 03/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 8:49 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 04/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove check on wdev is running Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 8:49 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-15 11:50 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 05/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup pull of iphc bytes Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 9:03 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 06/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: trivial checks at first Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 9:04 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 9:21 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-15 9:15 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 07/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change skb->dev earlier Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 9:13 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 08/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: change frag return value handling Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 9:14 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 9:26 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 09/16] ieee820154: 6lowpan: dispatch evaluation rework Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 10/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add dispatch evalualtion helpers Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51 ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2015-08-12 13:20 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:48 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 13:55 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 11/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix fragmentation dispatch mask Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 12:51 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 12/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add generic lowpan header check Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 13/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add handler for all dispatch values Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 14/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: add check for reserved dispatch Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 20:17 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 15/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: check on valid 802.15.4 frame Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 13:54 ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-03 6:23 ` [RFC 16/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: remove packet type to host Alexander Aring
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-12 8:15 ` [RFC 00/16] ieee802154: 6lowpan: cleanup and rework dispatch evaluation Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 9:10 ` Stefan Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB413E.4020304@osg.samsung.com \
--to=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.