From: "Nora Björklund" <nora.bjorklund@enea.com>
To: <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:36:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB59D7.7030900@enea.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;
I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there
is no machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for
t2080. Looking at the specification for the targets they seem very
similar (t2081 being a "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the
t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?
Best regards,
Nora Björklund
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 14:36 Nora Björklund [this message]
2015-08-18 10:08 ` Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary Luo Zhenhua
2015-08-31 7:08 ` Nora Björklund
2015-09-01 2:28 ` Luo Zhenhua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB59D7.7030900@enea.com \
--to=nora.bjorklund@enea.com \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.