Re: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

["Nora Björklund" <nora.bjorklund@enea.com>]

Hi Zhenhua,

Thank you for your reply. Are there any plans to upstream a machine 
definition to meta-fsl-ppc for t2081?

Best regards,
Nora

On 2015-08-18 12:08, Luo Zhenhua wrote:
> Hi Nora,
>
> T2081QDS is a different board from T2080QDS board (Pins of T2081 are not compatible with T2080), T2081 uses different RCW, u-boot, dts images from T2080. T2081 uses same kernel image as T2080. So a new machine definition is needed for T2081.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
>> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nora Bj?rklund
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:36 PM
>> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;
>>
>> I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there is no
>> machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for t2080. Looking
>> at the specification for the targets they seem very similar (t2081 being a
>> "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the
>> t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Nora Björklund
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-freescale mailing list
>> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale