Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

[Nora Björklund]

Hi,

I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;

I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there 
is no machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for 
t2080. Looking at the specification for the targets they seem very 
similar (t2081 being a "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the 
t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?

Best regards,
Nora Björklund

Re: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

[Luo Zhenhua]

Hi Nora, 

T2081QDS is a different board from T2080QDS board (Pins of T2081 are not compatible with T2080), T2081 uses different RCW, u-boot, dts images from T2080. T2081 uses same kernel image as T2080. So a new machine definition is needed for T2081.


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nora Bj?rklund
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:36 PM
> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;
> 
> I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there is no
> machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for t2080. Looking
> at the specification for the targets they seem very similar (t2081 being a
> "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the
> t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?
> 
> Best regards,
> Nora Björklund
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Re: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

[Nora Björklund]

Hi Zhenhua,

Thank you for your reply. Are there any plans to upstream a machine 
definition to meta-fsl-ppc for t2081?

Best regards,
Nora

On 2015-08-18 12:08, Luo Zhenhua wrote:
> Hi Nora,
>
> T2081QDS is a different board from T2080QDS board (Pins of T2081 are not compatible with T2080), T2081 uses different RCW, u-boot, dts images from T2080. T2081 uses same kernel image as T2080. So a new machine definition is needed for T2081.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
>> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nora Bj?rklund
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:36 PM
>> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;
>>
>> I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there is no
>> machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for t2080. Looking
>> at the specification for the targets they seem very similar (t2081 being a
>> "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the
>> t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Nora Björklund
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-freescale mailing list
>> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Re: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary

[Luo Zhenhua]

Hi Nora, 

We will add the machine conf in meta-fsl-ppc when there is plan to add t2081 support in official QorIQ SDK, currently there is no plan. 


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nora Björklund [mailto:nora.bjorklund@enea.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 3:08 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <zhenhua.luo@freescale.com>; meta-
> freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
> 
> Hi Zhenhua,
> 
> Thank you for your reply. Are there any plans to upstream a machine definition
> to meta-fsl-ppc for t2081?
> 
> Best regards,
> Nora
> 
> On 2015-08-18 12:08, Luo Zhenhua wrote:
> > Hi Nora,
> >
> > T2081QDS is a different board from T2080QDS board (Pins of T2081 are not
> compatible with T2080), T2081 uses different RCW, u-boot, dts images from
> T2080. T2081 uses same kernel image as T2080. So a new machine definition is
> needed for T2081.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Zhenhua
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nora Bj?rklund
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:36 PM
> >> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> >> Subject: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081;
> >>
> >> I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however
> >> there is no machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine,
> >> just for t2080. Looking at the specification for the targets they
> >> seem very similar (t2081 being a "smaller" version of t2080). Is it
> >> OK to use the
> >> t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Nora Björklund
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> meta-freescale mailing list
> >> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale