* [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
@ 2015-08-07 15:54 ` Nicholas Krause
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Krause @ 2015-08-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gleb; +Cc: pbonzini, agraf, kvm, kvm-ppc, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
to signal success to this function's caller to instead
return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
to this particular function has failed.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
index 6249cdc..b14b85a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
@@ -1641,16 +1641,17 @@ static void mpic_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
static int mpic_set_default_irq_routing(struct openpic *opp)
{
struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *routing;
+ int ret;
/* Create a nop default map, so that dereferencing it still works */
routing = kzalloc((sizeof(*routing)), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!routing)
return -ENOMEM;
- kvm_set_irq_routing(opp->kvm, routing, 0, 0);
+ ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(opp->kvm, routing, 0, 0);
kfree(routing);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int mpic_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
@ 2015-08-07 15:54 ` Nicholas Krause
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Krause @ 2015-08-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gleb; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, pbonzini, linuxppc-dev, agraf
This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
to signal success to this function's caller to instead
return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
to this particular function has failed.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
index 6249cdc..b14b85a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
@@ -1641,16 +1641,17 @@ static void mpic_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
static int mpic_set_default_irq_routing(struct openpic *opp)
{
struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *routing;
+ int ret;
/* Create a nop default map, so that dereferencing it still works */
routing = kzalloc((sizeof(*routing)), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!routing)
return -ENOMEM;
- kvm_set_irq_routing(opp->kvm, routing, 0, 0);
+ ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(opp->kvm, routing, 0, 0);
kfree(routing);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int mpic_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
2015-08-07 15:54 ` Nicholas Krause
@ 2015-08-12 19:05 ` Alexander Graf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2015-08-12 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas Krause, gleb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, pbonzini, kvm, kvm-ppc, linux-kernel
On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
> to this particular function has failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
sending it out?
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
@ 2015-08-12 19:05 ` Alexander Graf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2015-08-12 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas Krause, gleb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, pbonzini, kvm, kvm-ppc, linux-kernel
On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
> to this particular function has failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
sending it out?
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
2015-08-12 19:05 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2015-08-12 19:06 ` nick
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2015-08-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf, gleb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, pbonzini, kvm, kvm-ppc, linux-kernel
On 2015-08-12 03:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
>> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
>> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
>> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
>> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
>> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
>> to this particular function has failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>
> I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
> doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
> sending it out?
>
>
> Alex
>
Alex,
Ask Paolo about it as he would be able to explain it better then I.
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
@ 2015-08-12 19:06 ` nick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2015-08-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf, gleb; +Cc: pbonzini, linuxppc-dev, kvm-ppc, kvm, linux-kernel
On 2015-08-12 03:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
>> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
>> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
>> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
>> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
>> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
>> to this particular function has failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>
> I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
> doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
> sending it out?
>
>
> Alex
>
Alex,
Ask Paolo about it as he would be able to explain it better then I.
Nick
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
2015-08-12 19:06 ` nick
@ 2015-08-12 19:12 ` Alexander Graf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2015-08-12 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nick, gleb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, pbonzini, kvm, kvm-ppc, linux-kernel
On 12.08.15 21:06, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-08-12 03:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
>>> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
>>> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
>>> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
>>> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
>>> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
>>> to this particular function has failed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>>
>> I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
>> doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
>> sending it out?
>>
>>
>> Alex
>>
> Alex,
> Ask Paolo about it as he would be able to explain it better then I.
Well, whatever the reason, I can only apply patches that actually
appeared on the public mailing list. Otherwise people may not get the
chance to review them ;).
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing
@ 2015-08-12 19:12 ` Alexander Graf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2015-08-12 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nick, gleb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, pbonzini, kvm, kvm-ppc, linux-kernel
On 12.08.15 21:06, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-08-12 03:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07.08.15 17:54, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This fixes the incorrect return statement in the function
>>> mpic_set_default_irq_routing from always returning zero
>>> to signal success to this function's caller to instead
>>> return the return value of kvm_set_irq_routing as this
>>> function can fail and we need to correctly signal the
>>> caller of mpic_set_default_irq_routing when the call
>>> to this particular function has failed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>>
>> I like the patch, but I don't see it on the kvm-ppc mailing list. It
>> doesn't show up on patchwork or spinics. Did something go wrong while
>> sending it out?
>>
>>
>> Alex
>>
> Alex,
> Ask Paolo about it as he would be able to explain it better then I.
Well, whatever the reason, I can only apply patches that actually
appeared on the public mailing list. Otherwise people may not get the
chance to review them ;).
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-12 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-07 15:54 [PATCH] kvm:powerpc:Fix incorrect return statement in the function mpic_set_default_irq_routing Nicholas Krause
2015-08-07 15:54 ` Nicholas Krause
2015-08-12 19:05 ` Alexander Graf
2015-08-12 19:05 ` Alexander Graf
2015-08-12 19:06 ` nick
2015-08-12 19:06 ` nick
2015-08-12 19:12 ` Alexander Graf
2015-08-12 19:12 ` Alexander Graf
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.