Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clocksource: mediatek: do not enable GPT_CLK_EVT when setup

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 08/17/2015 04:10 PM, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:35 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/22/2015 10:14 AM, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
>>> Spurious mtk timer interrupt is noticed at boot and cause kernel
>>> crash. It seems if GPT is enabled, it will latch irq status even
>>> when its IRQ is disabled.

It "seems" ?

>>> When irq is enabled afterward, we see
>>> spurious interrupt.

Doesn't have the firmware something to do with that ?

I have a mtk 8173 board I can use next week. How do you reproduce the 
issue ?

>>> Change init flow to only enable GPT_CLK_SRC at mtk_timer_init.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Update to my patch [1], added __init as Daniel suggest. This is the
>>> only patch that need to change in that series, so I only sent this one.
>>>
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-July/001545.html
>>>
>>>    drivers/clocksource/mtk_timer.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/mtk_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/mtk_timer.c
>>> index 68ab423..2ba5b66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/mtk_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/mtk_timer.c
>>> @@ -156,9 +156,11 @@ static void mtk_timer_global_reset(struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt)
>>>    	writel(0x3f, evt->gpt_base + GPT_IRQ_ACK_REG);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -static void
>>> -mtk_timer_setup(struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt, u8 timer, u8 option)
>>> +static void __init mtk_timer_setup(struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt,
>>> +				   u8 timer, u8 option, bool enable)
>>>    {
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +
>>>    	writel(TIMER_CTRL_CLEAR | TIMER_CTRL_DISABLE,
>>>    		evt->gpt_base + TIMER_CTRL_REG(timer));
>>>
>>> @@ -167,8 +169,10 @@ mtk_timer_setup(struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt, u8 timer, u8 option)
>>>
>>>    	writel(0x0, evt->gpt_base + TIMER_CMP_REG(timer));
>>>
>>> -	writel(TIMER_CTRL_OP(option) | TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE,
>>> -			evt->gpt_base + TIMER_CTRL_REG(timer));
>>> +	val = TIMER_CTRL_OP(option);
>>> +	if (enable)
>>> +		val |= TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE;
>>> +	writel(val, evt->gpt_base + TIMER_CTRL_REG(timer));
>>
>> Instead of the 'enable' new option, I prefer a test with 'timer' with a
>> comment:
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * the timer hw is broken in that way ... bla bla, so we only
>> 	 * enable the clocksource ...
>> 	 */
>> 	if (timer == GPT_CLK_SRC)
>> 		val |= TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE;
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your review.
> Since this bug happens to anyone using interrupt,

Can you elaborate ? I don't get the point.

> I'm not sure checking
> timer and only enable it for GPT_CLK_SRC is easier to read. Anyway, I'll
> change to this in next version.
>> That said, can you have a look at commit 1096be08 ?
>> "clockevents: sun5i: Fix setup_irq init sequence"
>>
>> first and check if moving the interrupt request after the
>> clockevents_config_and_register could fix your issue.
>
> I've tested this before, see:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-May/000539.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-May/000551.html

I could take or ack this patch trusting it fixes the issue but there are 
some points that need clarifications.

  - Does the spurious interrupt occurs *every* time ? at each boot ?

The previous patches were supposed to fix the issue but they actually 
didn't. So how is tested the patch ?

Regarding the different fixes for this problem, it sounds like you are 
proceeding by trial and error.

Please give a more detailed analysis of the problem and especially check 
the timer is not altered by the firmware leaving it in a transient state 
or whatever.

   -- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog