All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/22] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:05:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560546B0.7070909@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150925113808.GL6281@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>

On 25/09/15 12:38, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:21:05PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>
>> This patch adds an infrastructure to keep track of the CPU feature
>> registers on the system. For each register, the infrastructure keeps
>> track of the system wide safe value of the feature bits. Also, tracks
>> the which fields of a register should be matched strictly across all
>> the CPUs on the system for the SANITY check infrastructure.
>>
>> The feature bits are classified as one of SCALAR_MIN, SCALAR_MAX and DISCRETE
>> depending on the implication of the possible values. This information
>> is used to decide the safe value for a feature.
>>
>> SCALAR_MIN - The smaller value is safer
>> SCALAR_MAX - The bigger value is safer
>> DISCRETE - We can't decide between the two, so a predefined safe_value is used.
>
> Can documentation of the meanings of these be added somewhere in the
> relevant header or in Documentation?

Sure. They were part of the initial draft and eventually lost them over the
reworks. I will add them back, since there is wider use of the information
across the system, from what I started with(i.e, Userspace visibility).

Cheers
Suzuki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"aph@redhat.com" <aph@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"edward.nevill@linaro.org" <edward.nevill@linaro.org>,
	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/22] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:05:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560546B0.7070909@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150925113808.GL6281@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>

On 25/09/15 12:38, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:21:05PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>
>> This patch adds an infrastructure to keep track of the CPU feature
>> registers on the system. For each register, the infrastructure keeps
>> track of the system wide safe value of the feature bits. Also, tracks
>> the which fields of a register should be matched strictly across all
>> the CPUs on the system for the SANITY check infrastructure.
>>
>> The feature bits are classified as one of SCALAR_MIN, SCALAR_MAX and DISCRETE
>> depending on the implication of the possible values. This information
>> is used to decide the safe value for a feature.
>>
>> SCALAR_MIN - The smaller value is safer
>> SCALAR_MAX - The bigger value is safer
>> DISCRETE - We can't decide between the two, so a predefined safe_value is used.
>
> Can documentation of the meanings of these be added somewhere in the
> relevant header or in Documentation?

Sure. They were part of the initial draft and eventually lost them over the
reworks. I will add them back, since there is wider use of the information
across the system, from what I started with(i.e, Userspace visibility).

Cheers
Suzuki


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-25 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-16 14:20 [PATCH 00/22] arm64: Consolidate CPU feature handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:20 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH 01/22] arm64: Make the CPU information more clear Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:20   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/22] arm64: Delay ELF HWCAP initialisation until all CPUs are up Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/22] arm64: Move cpu feature detection code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm64: Move mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 05/22] arm64: Move /proc/cpuinfo handling code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/22] arm64: sys_reg: Define System register encoding Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 07/22] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-25 11:38   ` Dave Martin
2015-09-25 11:38     ` Dave Martin
2015-09-25 13:05     ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-09-25 13:05       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 08/22] arm64: Consolidate CPU Sanity check to CPU Feature infrastructure Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 09/22] arm64: Read system wide CPUID value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm64: Cleanup mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 11/22] arm64: Populate cpuinfo after notify_cpu_starting Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: Delay cpu feature checks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 13/22] arm64: Make use of system wide capability checks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 14/22] arm64: Cleanup HWCAP handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 15/22] arm64: Move FP/ASIMD hwcap handling to common code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 16/22] arm64/debug: Make use of the system wide safe value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-29 12:17   ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-09-29 12:17     ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-09-29 12:46     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-29 12:46       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-30 16:13     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-30 16:13       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 17/22] arm64/kvm: Make use of the system wide safe values Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 18/22] arm64: Add helper to decode register from instruction Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 19/22] arm64: cpufeature: Track the user visible fields Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 20/22] arm64: Expose feature registers by emulating MRS Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 21/22] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 22/22] arm64: feature registers: Documentation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-16 14:21   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-18  9:23 ` [PATCH 00/22] arm64: Consolidate CPU feature handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-18  9:23   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-22 15:19   ` James Morse
2015-09-22 15:19     ` James Morse
2015-09-22 15:21     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-22 15:21       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-23 15:56 ` Dave Martin
2015-09-23 15:56   ` Dave Martin
2015-09-23 15:58   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-23 15:58     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-23 16:37     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-23 16:37       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-23 17:08       ` Dave P Martin
2015-09-23 17:08         ` Dave P Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560546B0.7070909@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.