From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device probing infrastructure
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:41:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560AA30E.8030008@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443451758-22717-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 09/28/2015 10:49 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel
> requires before being able to use the device driver model.
>
> ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one
> we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and
> clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up
> and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly
> hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer.
>
> In order to allow some basic probing based on the ACPI tables,
> introduce "struct acpi_probe_entry" which contains just enough
> data and callbacks to match a table, an optional subtable, and
> call a probe function. A driver can, at build time, register itself
> and expect being called if the right entry exists in the ACPI
> table.
>
> A acpi_probe_device_table() is provided, taking an identifier for
> a set of acpi_prove_entries, and iterating over the registered
> entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device probing infrastructure
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:41:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560AA30E.8030008@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443451758-22717-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 09/28/2015 10:49 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel
> requires before being able to use the device driver model.
>
> ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one
> we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and
> clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up
> and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly
> hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer.
>
> In order to allow some basic probing based on the ACPI tables,
> introduce "struct acpi_probe_entry" which contains just enough
> data and callbacks to match a table, an optional subtable, and
> call a probe function. A driver can, at build time, register itself
> and expect being called if the right entry exists in the ACPI
> table.
>
> A acpi_probe_device_table() is provided, taking an identifier for
> a set of acpi_prove_entries, and iterating over the registered
> entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 14:49 [PATCH v3 0/7] Early ACPI probing infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 4:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 4:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 11:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-29 11:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-29 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-09-29 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-02 21:06 ` Wei Huang
2015-10-02 21:06 ` Wei Huang
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-05 17:07 ` Wei Huang
2015-10-05 17:07 ` Wei Huang
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 14:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 14:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 15:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based clocksources Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] clocksource: Add new CLKSRC_{PROBE,ACPI} config symbols Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] clocksource: Add new CLKSRC_{PROBE, ACPI} " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource: cosmetic: Drop OF 'dependency' from symbols Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 15:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Early ACPI probing infrastructure Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-28 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-30 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-30 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-05 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-05 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-29 15:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:25 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560AA30E.8030008@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.