From: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device probing infrastructure
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:06:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560EF1BD.1020004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443451758-22717-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 09/28/2015 09:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel
> requires before being able to use the device driver model.
>
> ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one
> we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and
> clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up
> and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly
> hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer.
>
> In order to allow some basic probing based on the ACPI tables,
> introduce "struct acpi_probe_entry" which contains just enough
> data and callbacks to match a table, an optional subtable, and
> call a probe function. A driver can, at build time, register itself
> and expect being called if the right entry exists in the ACPI
> table.
>
> A acpi_probe_device_table() is provided, taking an identifier for
> a set of acpi_prove_entries, and iterating over the registered
> entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 10 ++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index f834b8c..daf9fc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1913,3 +1913,42 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> return result;
> }
> +
> +static struct acpi_probe_entry *ape;
> +static int acpi_probe_count;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_probe_lock);
> +
> +static int __init acpi_match_madt(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> + const unsigned long end)
> +{
> + if (!ape->subtable_valid || ape->subtable_valid(header, ape))
> + if (!ape->probe_subtbl(header, end))
> + acpi_probe_count++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
> +{
> + int count = 0;
> +
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&acpi_probe_lock);
> + for (ape = ap_head; nr; ape++, nr--) {
> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id)) {
> + acpi_probe_count = 0;
> + acpi_table_parse_madt(ape->type, acpi_match_madt, 0);
> + count += acpi_probe_count;
> + } else {
> + int res;
> + res = acpi_table_parse(ape->id, ape->probe_table);
> + if (!res)
> + count++;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&acpi_probe_lock);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 1781e54..efd7ed1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,16 @@
> #define CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE, cpuidle_method)
> #define EARLYCON_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON, earlycon)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name) \
> + . = ALIGN(8); \
> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__##name##_acpi_probe_table) = .; \
> + *(__##name##_acpi_probe_table) \
> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__##name##_acpi_probe_table_end) = .;
> +#else
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name)
> +#endif
> +
> #define KERNEL_DTB() \
> STRUCT_ALIGN(); \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dtb_start) = .; \
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 84e7055..51a96a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -787,6 +787,61 @@ int acpi_dev_prop_read(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *propname,
>
> struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(struct device *dev,
> struct fwnode_handle *subnode);
> +
> +struct acpi_probe_entry;
> +typedef bool (*acpi_probe_entry_validate_subtbl)(struct acpi_subtable_header *,
> + struct acpi_probe_entry *);
> +
> +#define ACPI_TABLE_ID_LEN 5
> +
> +/**
> + * struct acpi_probe_entry - boot-time probing entry
> + * @id: ACPI table name
> + * @type: Optional subtable type to match
> + * (if @id contains subtables)
> + * @subtable_valid: Optional callback to check the validity of
> + * the subtable
> + * @probe_table: Callback to the driver being probed when table
> + * match is successful
> + * @probe_subtbl: Callback to the driver being probed when table and
> + * subtable match (and optional callback is successful)
> + * @driver_data: Sideband data provided back to the driver
> + */
A suggestion: could you add more details to the description above? I couldn't figure how to use it without reading __acpi_probe_device_table(). Something like "if @id matches the one defined in __acpi_probe_device_table(), then probe_subtbl() will be invoked; otherwise probe_table() will be invoked" would be helpful for programmers use this struct.
> +struct acpi_probe_entry {
> + __u8 id[ACPI_TABLE_ID_LEN];
> + __u8 type;
> + acpi_probe_entry_validate_subtbl subtable_valid;
> + union {
> + acpi_tbl_table_handler probe_table;
> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler probe_subtbl;
> + };
Could we avoid using union for probe_table & probe_subtbl? The benefit is that we don't need to do function casting below and compiler can automatically check the correctness.
> + kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> +};
> +
> +#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn) \
> + static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name \
> + __used __section(__##table##_acpi_probe_table) \
> + = { \
> + .id = table_id, \
> + .type = subtable, \
> + .subtable_valid = valid, \
> + .probe_table = (acpi_tbl_table_handler)fn, \
> + .driver_data = data, \
> + }
> +
Something like:
#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn, subfn) \
static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name \
__used __section(__##table##_acpi_probe_table) \
= { \
.id = table_id, \
.type = subtable, \
.subtable_valid = valid, \
.probe_table = fn, \
.probe_subtbl = subfn, \
.driver_data = data, \
}
Then in patch 3, you can define new entries as:
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(gic_v2, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR,
gic_validate_dist, ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_V2,
NULL, gic_v2_acpi_init);
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(gic_v2_maybe, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR,
gic_validate_dist, ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_NONE,
NULL, gic_v2_acpi_init);
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name) __##name##_acpi_probe_table
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(name) __##name##_acpi_probe_table_end
> +
> +int __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *start, int nr);
> +
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) \
> + ({ \
> + extern struct acpi_probe_entry ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t), \
> + ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t); \
> + __acpi_probe_device_table(&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t), \
> + (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \
> + &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \
> + })
> #else
> static inline int acpi_dev_get_property(struct acpi_device *adev,
> const char *name, acpi_object_type type,
> @@ -845,6 +900,17 @@ static inline struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(struct device *dev,
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, validate, data, fn) \
> + static const void * __acpi_table_##name[] \
> + __attribute__((unused)) \
> + = { (void *) table_id, \
> + (void *) subtable, \
> + (void *) valid, \
> + (void *) fn, \
> + (void *) data }
> +
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r;})
> #endif
>
> #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wei@redhat.com (Wei Huang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device probing infrastructure
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:06:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560EF1BD.1020004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443451758-22717-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 09/28/2015 09:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel
> requires before being able to use the device driver model.
>
> ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one
> we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and
> clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up
> and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly
> hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer.
>
> In order to allow some basic probing based on the ACPI tables,
> introduce "struct acpi_probe_entry" which contains just enough
> data and callbacks to match a table, an optional subtable, and
> call a probe function. A driver can, at build time, register itself
> and expect being called if the right entry exists in the ACPI
> table.
>
> A acpi_probe_device_table() is provided, taking an identifier for
> a set of acpi_prove_entries, and iterating over the registered
> entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 10 ++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index f834b8c..daf9fc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1913,3 +1913,42 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> return result;
> }
> +
> +static struct acpi_probe_entry *ape;
> +static int acpi_probe_count;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_probe_lock);
> +
> +static int __init acpi_match_madt(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> + const unsigned long end)
> +{
> + if (!ape->subtable_valid || ape->subtable_valid(header, ape))
> + if (!ape->probe_subtbl(header, end))
> + acpi_probe_count++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
> +{
> + int count = 0;
> +
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&acpi_probe_lock);
> + for (ape = ap_head; nr; ape++, nr--) {
> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id)) {
> + acpi_probe_count = 0;
> + acpi_table_parse_madt(ape->type, acpi_match_madt, 0);
> + count += acpi_probe_count;
> + } else {
> + int res;
> + res = acpi_table_parse(ape->id, ape->probe_table);
> + if (!res)
> + count++;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&acpi_probe_lock);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 1781e54..efd7ed1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,16 @@
> #define CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE, cpuidle_method)
> #define EARLYCON_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON, earlycon)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name) \
> + . = ALIGN(8); \
> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__##name##_acpi_probe_table) = .; \
> + *(__##name##_acpi_probe_table) \
> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__##name##_acpi_probe_table_end) = .;
> +#else
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name)
> +#endif
> +
> #define KERNEL_DTB() \
> STRUCT_ALIGN(); \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dtb_start) = .; \
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 84e7055..51a96a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -787,6 +787,61 @@ int acpi_dev_prop_read(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *propname,
>
> struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(struct device *dev,
> struct fwnode_handle *subnode);
> +
> +struct acpi_probe_entry;
> +typedef bool (*acpi_probe_entry_validate_subtbl)(struct acpi_subtable_header *,
> + struct acpi_probe_entry *);
> +
> +#define ACPI_TABLE_ID_LEN 5
> +
> +/**
> + * struct acpi_probe_entry - boot-time probing entry
> + * @id: ACPI table name
> + * @type: Optional subtable type to match
> + * (if @id contains subtables)
> + * @subtable_valid: Optional callback to check the validity of
> + * the subtable
> + * @probe_table: Callback to the driver being probed when table
> + * match is successful
> + * @probe_subtbl: Callback to the driver being probed when table and
> + * subtable match (and optional callback is successful)
> + * @driver_data: Sideband data provided back to the driver
> + */
A suggestion: could you add more details to the description above? I couldn't figure how to use it without reading __acpi_probe_device_table(). Something like "if @id matches the one defined in __acpi_probe_device_table(), then probe_subtbl() will be invoked; otherwise probe_table() will be invoked" would be helpful for programmers use this struct.
> +struct acpi_probe_entry {
> + __u8 id[ACPI_TABLE_ID_LEN];
> + __u8 type;
> + acpi_probe_entry_validate_subtbl subtable_valid;
> + union {
> + acpi_tbl_table_handler probe_table;
> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler probe_subtbl;
> + };
Could we avoid using union for probe_table & probe_subtbl? The benefit is that we don't need to do function casting below and compiler can automatically check the correctness.
> + kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> +};
> +
> +#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn) \
> + static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name \
> + __used __section(__##table##_acpi_probe_table) \
> + = { \
> + .id = table_id, \
> + .type = subtable, \
> + .subtable_valid = valid, \
> + .probe_table = (acpi_tbl_table_handler)fn, \
> + .driver_data = data, \
> + }
> +
Something like:
#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn, subfn) \
static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name \
__used __section(__##table##_acpi_probe_table) \
= { \
.id = table_id, \
.type = subtable, \
.subtable_valid = valid, \
.probe_table = fn, \
.probe_subtbl = subfn, \
.driver_data = data, \
}
Then in patch 3, you can define new entries as:
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(gic_v2, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR,
gic_validate_dist, ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_V2,
NULL, gic_v2_acpi_init);
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(gic_v2_maybe, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR,
gic_validate_dist, ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_NONE,
NULL, gic_v2_acpi_init);
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(name) __##name##_acpi_probe_table
> +#define ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(name) __##name##_acpi_probe_table_end
> +
> +int __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *start, int nr);
> +
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) \
> + ({ \
> + extern struct acpi_probe_entry ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t), \
> + ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t); \
> + __acpi_probe_device_table(&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t), \
> + (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \
> + &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \
> + })
> #else
> static inline int acpi_dev_get_property(struct acpi_device *adev,
> const char *name, acpi_object_type type,
> @@ -845,6 +900,17 @@ static inline struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(struct device *dev,
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, validate, data, fn) \
> + static const void * __acpi_table_##name[] \
> + __attribute__((unused)) \
> + = { (void *) table_id, \
> + (void *) subtable, \
> + (void *) valid, \
> + (void *) fn, \
> + (void *) data }
> +
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r;})
> #endif
>
> #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 14:49 [PATCH v3 0/7] Early ACPI probing infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] acpi: Add early device " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 4:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 4:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 7:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 12:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 11:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-29 11:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-29 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-02 21:06 ` Wei Huang [this message]
2015-10-02 21:06 ` Wei Huang
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-03 10:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-05 17:07 ` Wei Huang
2015-10-05 17:07 ` Wei Huang
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 14:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 14:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 15:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based clocksources Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] clocksource: Add new CLKSRC_{PROBE,ACPI} config symbols Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] clocksource: Add new CLKSRC_{PROBE, ACPI} " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-28 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource: cosmetic: Drop OF 'dependency' from symbols Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-29 10:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 10:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-29 15:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-28 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Early ACPI probing infrastructure Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-28 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-30 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-30 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-05 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-05 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-29 15:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-29 15:25 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560EF1BD.1020004@redhat.com \
--to=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.