From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:16:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CDDBC.8000400@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560C42CE.6090000@sandisk.com>
>>> Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I
>>> placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and
>>> see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen
>>> any sign of it)?
>>
>> Sorry but I still see these messages with the reg_api.5 branch.
>> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# git show HEAD | grep ^commit
>> commit 3b5b34777d3cd606433f0aca51e3885323648e07
>> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# uname -a
>> Linux ib-ini 4.2.0-rc6-debug+ #1 SMP Wed Sep 30 11:38:36 PDT 2015 x86_64
>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I will try to run a bisect.
>
> (replying to my own e-mail)
>
> Apparently this behavior got introduced through the patch "IB/srp:
> Convert to new registration API" (commit
> ad66cbace5ca8c60673bedf35e5027868b0dd2d7). Without that patch SRP I/O
> works fine. With that patch I see receive failures being reported. The
> SRP initiator was loaded on my setup with the following kernel driver
> options:
>
> # cat /etc/modprobe.d/ib_srp.conf
> options ib_srp cmd_sg_entries=255 prefer_fr=1 register_always=1
Strange. I don't see that.
options ib_srp prefer_fr=1 register_always=1 are set by default.
When I try to connect srp initiator against upstream srpt with
cmd_sg_entries=255 I get CM reject on iu max size:
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: REJ received
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: SRP_LOGIN_REJ: requested max_it_iu_len too
large
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: Connection 0/8 failed
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: Sending CM DREQ failed
When I connect with cmd_sg_entries=128 I successfully connect:
kernel: scsi host18: SRP.T10:F452140300117400
kernel: scsi 18:0:0:0: Direct-Access LIO-ORG RAMDISK-MCP 4.0
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
kernel: scsi host18: ib_srp: new target: id_ext f452140300117400
ioc_guid f452140300117400 pkey ffff service_id f452140300117400 sgid
fe80:0000:0000:0000:f452:1403:0011:7411 dgid
fe80:0000:0000:0000:f452:1403:0011:7401
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] 20480 512-byte logical blocks: (10.4 MB/10.0 MiB)
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Write Protect is off
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 08
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Attached SCSI disk
I wander what is the difference between our test environments? I can't
look into this if I'm not able to reproduce.
Sagi.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger"
<nab-IzHhD5pYlfBP7FQvKIMDCQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:16:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CDDBC.8000400@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560C42CE.6090000-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I
>>> placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and
>>> see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen
>>> any sign of it)?
>>
>> Sorry but I still see these messages with the reg_api.5 branch.
>> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# git show HEAD | grep ^commit
>> commit 3b5b34777d3cd606433f0aca51e3885323648e07
>> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# uname -a
>> Linux ib-ini 4.2.0-rc6-debug+ #1 SMP Wed Sep 30 11:38:36 PDT 2015 x86_64
>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I will try to run a bisect.
>
> (replying to my own e-mail)
>
> Apparently this behavior got introduced through the patch "IB/srp:
> Convert to new registration API" (commit
> ad66cbace5ca8c60673bedf35e5027868b0dd2d7). Without that patch SRP I/O
> works fine. With that patch I see receive failures being reported. The
> SRP initiator was loaded on my setup with the following kernel driver
> options:
>
> # cat /etc/modprobe.d/ib_srp.conf
> options ib_srp cmd_sg_entries=255 prefer_fr=1 register_always=1
Strange. I don't see that.
options ib_srp prefer_fr=1 register_always=1 are set by default.
When I try to connect srp initiator against upstream srpt with
cmd_sg_entries=255 I get CM reject on iu max size:
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: REJ received
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: SRP_LOGIN_REJ: requested max_it_iu_len too
large
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: Connection 0/8 failed
kernel: scsi host17: ib_srp: Sending CM DREQ failed
When I connect with cmd_sg_entries=128 I successfully connect:
kernel: scsi host18: SRP.T10:F452140300117400
kernel: scsi 18:0:0:0: Direct-Access LIO-ORG RAMDISK-MCP 4.0
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
kernel: scsi host18: ib_srp: new target: id_ext f452140300117400
ioc_guid f452140300117400 pkey ffff service_id f452140300117400 sgid
fe80:0000:0000:0000:f452:1403:0011:7411 dgid
fe80:0000:0000:0000:f452:1403:0011:7401
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] 20480 512-byte logical blocks: (10.4 MB/10.0 MiB)
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Write Protect is off
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 08
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
kernel: sd 18:0:0:0: [sdy] Attached SCSI disk
I wander what is the difference between our test environments? I can't
look into this if I'm not able to reproduce.
Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 9:42 [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 01/24] IB/core: Introduce new " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-22 21:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24 7:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 7:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-28 20:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-28 20:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-29 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-29 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-29 6:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 6:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 6:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 6:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 6:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 6:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 02/24] IB/mlx5: Remove dead fmr code Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-22 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 03/24] IB/mlx5: Support the new memory registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-22 21:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24 7:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 7:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/24] IB/mlx4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 05/24] RDMA/ocrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 06/24] RDMA/cxgb3: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 07/24] iw_cxgb4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 08/24] IB/qib: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 09/24] RDMA/nes: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 10/24] IB/iser: Port to new fast " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 11/24] iser-target: Port to new memory " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 12/24] xprtrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 13/24] svcrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 14/24] RDS/IW: Convert " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/24] IB/srp: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-22 21:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24 9:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 9:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 16/24] IB/mlx5: Remove old FRWR API support Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 17/24] IB/mlx4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 18/24] RDMA/ocrdma: Remove old FRWR API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 19/24] RDMA/cxgb3: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 20/24] iw_cxgb4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 21/24] IB/qib: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 22/24] RDMA/nes: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 23/24] IB/hfi1: Remove Old fast registraion API support Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` [PATCH v1 24/24] IB/core: Remove old fast registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17 9:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-19 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 00/24] New " Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-19 22:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-24 6:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 6:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-24 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-19 23:20 ` santosh.shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:20 ` santosh.shilimkar-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
2015-09-20 9:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-20 9:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-21 23:28 ` santosh.shilimkar
2015-09-21 23:28 ` santosh.shilimkar-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
2015-09-22 7:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 7:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 7:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 7:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 18:23 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-22 18:23 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-22 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-22 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24 7:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 7:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-29 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-29 20:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 20:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-30 6:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-30 6:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-30 18:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-30 18:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-30 20:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-30 20:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-01 7:16 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2015-10-01 7:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-01 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-01 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-01 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-01 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <35618B90-4D6E-4036-A69B-4405F020D440@dev.mellanox.co.il>
2015-10-02 15:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-02 15:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-06 8:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-06 8:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-06 18:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-06 18:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07 6:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 6:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 15:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07 15:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07 9:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 9:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 9:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07 9:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07 10:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 10:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560CDDBC.8000400@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.