Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()

[Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>]

On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 10/01, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko St=C3=BCbner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks, so
>>>>> should have no problem going through another tree.
>>>>
>>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock
>>>> patches as well=3F
>>>
>>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings translation gets
>>> optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get no good phase and thus
>>> fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the system would stay running.
>>>
>>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches and
>>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-)
>>>
>>
>> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree.
>> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches.
> 
> I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an
> ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks.
> 
> Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts.

I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my repository.
Thanks for giving time! :)

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>