All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, dianders@chromium.org,
	amstan@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: MMC tuning with the clock phase framework
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:16:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5615C3D6.3030005@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443622064-14362-7-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de>

Hi, Heiko.

Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung


On 09/30/2015 11:07 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> 
> This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
> what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus, doing
> many tunings yields better results since some tests are run more than once
> (ex: if the underlying driver uses 45 degree increments, the tuning code
> will try the same angle more than once).
> 
> It will then construct a list of good phase ranges (even ranges that cross
> 360/0), will pick the biggest range then it will set the sample_clk to the
> middle of that range.
> 
> We do not touch ciu_drive (and by extension define default-drive-phase).
> Drive phase is mostly used to define minimum hold times, while one could
> write some code to determine what phase meets the minimum hold time (ex 10
> degrees) this will not work with the current clock phase framework (which
> floors angles, so we'll get 0 deg, and there's no way to know what
> resolution the floors happen at). We assume that the default drive angles
> set by the hardware are good enough.
> 
> If a device has device specific code (like exynos) then that will still
> take precedence, otherwise this new code will execute. If the device wants
> to tune, but has no sample_clk defined we'll return EIO with an error
> message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 162 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> index bc76aa2..4b3650f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> @@ -13,12 +13,19 @@
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
>  
>  #define RK3288_CLKGEN_DIV       2
>  
> +struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data {
> +	struct clk		*drv_clk;
> +	struct clk		*sample_clk;
> +	int			default_sample_phase;
> +};
> +
>  static void dw_mci_rockchip_prepare_command(struct dw_mci *host, u32 *cmdr)
>  {
>  	*cmdr |= SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG;
> @@ -33,6 +40,7 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_setup_clock(struct dw_mci *host)
>  
>  static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned int cclkin;
>  	u32 bus_hz;
> @@ -66,6 +74,158 @@ static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  		/* force dw_mci_setup_bus() */
>  		host->current_speed = 0;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Make sure we use phases which we can enumerate with */
> +	if (!IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
> +}
> +
> +#define NUM_PHASES			360
> +#define TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i)	(DIV_ROUND_UP((i) * 360, NUM_PHASES))
> +
> +static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
> +	struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int i;
> +	bool v, prev_v = 0, first_v;
> +	struct range_t {
> +		int start;
> +		int end; /* inclusive */
> +	};
> +	struct range_t *ranges;
> +	unsigned int range_count = 0;
> +	int longest_range_len = -1;
> +	int longest_range = -1;
> +	int middle_phase;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk)) {
> +		dev_err(host->dev, "Tuning clock (sample_clk) not defined.\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	ranges = kmalloc_array(NUM_PHASES / 2 + 1, sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ranges)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Try each phase and extract good ranges */
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ) {
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i));
> +
> +		v = !mmc_send_tuning(mmc);
> +
> +		if (i == 0)
> +			first_v = v;
> +
> +		if ((!prev_v) && v) {
> +			range_count++;
> +			ranges[range_count-1].start = i;
> +		}
> +		if (v) {
> +			ranges[range_count-1].end = i;
> +			i++;
> +		} else if (i == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
> +			/* No extra skipping rules if we're at the end */
> +			i++;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * No need to check too close to an invalid
> +			 * one since testing bad phases is slow.  Skip
> +			 * 20 degrees.
> +			 */
> +			i += DIV_ROUND_UP(20 * NUM_PHASES, 360);
> +
> +			/* Always test the last one */
> +			if (i >= NUM_PHASES)
> +				i = NUM_PHASES - 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		prev_v = v;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (range_count == 0) {
> +		dev_warn(host->dev, "All phases bad!");
> +		ret = -EIO;
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* wrap around case, merge the end points */
> +	if ((range_count > 1) && first_v && v) {
> +		ranges[0].start = ranges[range_count-1].start;
> +		range_count--;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ranges[0].start == 0 && ranges[0].end == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
> +		dev_info(host->dev, "All phases work, using default phase %d.",
> +			 priv->default_sample_phase);
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Find the longest range */
> +	for (i = 0; i < range_count; i++) {
> +		int len = (ranges[i].end - ranges[i].start + 1);
> +
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			len += NUM_PHASES;
> +
> +		if (longest_range_len < len) {
> +			longest_range_len = len;
> +			longest_range = i;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "Good phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
> +			TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].start),
> +			TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].end),
> +			len
> +		);
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(host->dev, "Best phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
> +		TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].start),
> +		TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].end),
> +		longest_range_len
> +	);
> +
> +	middle_phase = ranges[longest_range].start + longest_range_len / 2;
> +	middle_phase %= NUM_PHASES;
> +	dev_info(host->dev, "Successfully tuned phase to %d\n",
> +		 TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
> +
> +	clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk,
> +		      TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
> +
> +free:
> +	kfree(ranges);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node;
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rockchip,default-sample-phase",
> +					&priv->default_sample_phase))
> +		priv->default_sample_phase = 0;
> +
> +	priv->drv_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ciu-drive");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->drv_clk))
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu_drv not available\n");
> +
> +	priv->sample_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ciu-sample");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu_sample not available\n");
> +
> +	host->priv = priv;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int dw_mci_rockchip_init(struct dw_mci *host)
> @@ -95,6 +255,8 @@ static const struct dw_mci_drv_data rk3288_drv_data = {
>  	.caps			= dw_mci_rk3288_dwmmc_caps,
>  	.prepare_command        = dw_mci_rockchip_prepare_command,
>  	.set_ios		= dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios,
> +	.execute_tuning		= dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning,
> +	.parse_dt		= dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt,
>  	.setup_clock    = dw_mci_rk3288_setup_clock,
>  	.init			= dw_mci_rockchip_init,
>  };
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jh80.chung@samsung.com (Jaehoon Chung)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: MMC tuning with the clock phase framework
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:16:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5615C3D6.3030005@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443622064-14362-7-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de>

Hi, Heiko.

Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung


On 09/30/2015 11:07 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> 
> This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
> what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus, doing
> many tunings yields better results since some tests are run more than once
> (ex: if the underlying driver uses 45 degree increments, the tuning code
> will try the same angle more than once).
> 
> It will then construct a list of good phase ranges (even ranges that cross
> 360/0), will pick the biggest range then it will set the sample_clk to the
> middle of that range.
> 
> We do not touch ciu_drive (and by extension define default-drive-phase).
> Drive phase is mostly used to define minimum hold times, while one could
> write some code to determine what phase meets the minimum hold time (ex 10
> degrees) this will not work with the current clock phase framework (which
> floors angles, so we'll get 0 deg, and there's no way to know what
> resolution the floors happen at). We assume that the default drive angles
> set by the hardware are good enough.
> 
> If a device has device specific code (like exynos) then that will still
> take precedence, otherwise this new code will execute. If the device wants
> to tune, but has no sample_clk defined we'll return EIO with an error
> message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 162 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> index bc76aa2..4b3650f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> @@ -13,12 +13,19 @@
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
>  
>  #define RK3288_CLKGEN_DIV       2
>  
> +struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data {
> +	struct clk		*drv_clk;
> +	struct clk		*sample_clk;
> +	int			default_sample_phase;
> +};
> +
>  static void dw_mci_rockchip_prepare_command(struct dw_mci *host, u32 *cmdr)
>  {
>  	*cmdr |= SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG;
> @@ -33,6 +40,7 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_setup_clock(struct dw_mci *host)
>  
>  static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned int cclkin;
>  	u32 bus_hz;
> @@ -66,6 +74,158 @@ static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  		/* force dw_mci_setup_bus() */
>  		host->current_speed = 0;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Make sure we use phases which we can enumerate with */
> +	if (!IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
> +}
> +
> +#define NUM_PHASES			360
> +#define TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i)	(DIV_ROUND_UP((i) * 360, NUM_PHASES))
> +
> +static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
> +	struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int i;
> +	bool v, prev_v = 0, first_v;
> +	struct range_t {
> +		int start;
> +		int end; /* inclusive */
> +	};
> +	struct range_t *ranges;
> +	unsigned int range_count = 0;
> +	int longest_range_len = -1;
> +	int longest_range = -1;
> +	int middle_phase;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk)) {
> +		dev_err(host->dev, "Tuning clock (sample_clk) not defined.\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	ranges = kmalloc_array(NUM_PHASES / 2 + 1, sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ranges)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Try each phase and extract good ranges */
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ) {
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i));
> +
> +		v = !mmc_send_tuning(mmc);
> +
> +		if (i == 0)
> +			first_v = v;
> +
> +		if ((!prev_v) && v) {
> +			range_count++;
> +			ranges[range_count-1].start = i;
> +		}
> +		if (v) {
> +			ranges[range_count-1].end = i;
> +			i++;
> +		} else if (i == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
> +			/* No extra skipping rules if we're at the end */
> +			i++;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * No need to check too close to an invalid
> +			 * one since testing bad phases is slow.  Skip
> +			 * 20 degrees.
> +			 */
> +			i += DIV_ROUND_UP(20 * NUM_PHASES, 360);
> +
> +			/* Always test the last one */
> +			if (i >= NUM_PHASES)
> +				i = NUM_PHASES - 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		prev_v = v;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (range_count == 0) {
> +		dev_warn(host->dev, "All phases bad!");
> +		ret = -EIO;
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* wrap around case, merge the end points */
> +	if ((range_count > 1) && first_v && v) {
> +		ranges[0].start = ranges[range_count-1].start;
> +		range_count--;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ranges[0].start == 0 && ranges[0].end == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
> +		clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
> +		dev_info(host->dev, "All phases work, using default phase %d.",
> +			 priv->default_sample_phase);
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Find the longest range */
> +	for (i = 0; i < range_count; i++) {
> +		int len = (ranges[i].end - ranges[i].start + 1);
> +
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			len += NUM_PHASES;
> +
> +		if (longest_range_len < len) {
> +			longest_range_len = len;
> +			longest_range = i;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "Good phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
> +			TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].start),
> +			TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].end),
> +			len
> +		);
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(host->dev, "Best phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
> +		TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].start),
> +		TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].end),
> +		longest_range_len
> +	);
> +
> +	middle_phase = ranges[longest_range].start + longest_range_len / 2;
> +	middle_phase %= NUM_PHASES;
> +	dev_info(host->dev, "Successfully tuned phase to %d\n",
> +		 TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
> +
> +	clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk,
> +		      TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
> +
> +free:
> +	kfree(ranges);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node;
> +	struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rockchip,default-sample-phase",
> +					&priv->default_sample_phase))
> +		priv->default_sample_phase = 0;
> +
> +	priv->drv_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ciu-drive");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->drv_clk))
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu_drv not available\n");
> +
> +	priv->sample_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ciu-sample");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu_sample not available\n");
> +
> +	host->priv = priv;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int dw_mci_rockchip_init(struct dw_mci *host)
> @@ -95,6 +255,8 @@ static const struct dw_mci_drv_data rk3288_drv_data = {
>  	.caps			= dw_mci_rk3288_dwmmc_caps,
>  	.prepare_command        = dw_mci_rockchip_prepare_command,
>  	.set_ios		= dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios,
> +	.execute_tuning		= dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning,
> +	.parse_dt		= dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt,
>  	.setup_clock    = dw_mci_rk3288_setup_clock,
>  	.init			= dw_mci_rockchip_init,
>  };
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-08  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30 14:07 [PATCH v2 0/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: allow tuning using the clk-phase api Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: rockchip: Allow more precision for some mmc clock phases Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-22 12:03   ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-22 12:03     ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-22 12:03     ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-22 13:47     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-22 13:47       ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: rockchip: Make calculations use rounding Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-22 12:04   ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-22 12:04     ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-22 12:04     ` Michael Turquette
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-30 14:42     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-30 14:55     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-30 14:55       ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-01  9:54       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-01  9:54         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-01  9:54         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-01 10:21         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-01 10:21           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-01 10:21           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-01 17:35           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-01 17:35             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-01 21:05             ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-01 21:05               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-01 21:05               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-02  2:52               ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  2:52                 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  2:52                 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  7:06                 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-02  7:06                   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-02  7:06                   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-02  7:53                   ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  7:53                     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  8:43                     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-02  8:43                       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-02  8:43                       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-02  8:48                       ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  8:48                         ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  8:48                         ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-02  8:57                         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-02  8:57                           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mmc: dw_mmc: Use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc in start_signal_voltage_switch Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-08  1:15   ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-08  1:15     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-09 19:06   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-09 19:06     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-09 20:12     ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 20:12       ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 20:17       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-09 20:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: dt-binding: Add tuning related things Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-08  1:15   ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-08  1:15     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: MMC tuning with the clock phase framework Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-08  1:16   ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2015-10-08  1:16     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add drive/sample clocks for rk3288 dw_mmc devices Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: add tuning related settings to veyron devices Heiko Stuebner
2015-09-30 14:07   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-08 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: allow tuning using the clk-phase api Ulf Hansson
2015-10-08 17:36   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-08 17:36   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-09  8:10   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-09  8:10     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-09 17:19     ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 17:19       ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 20:11       ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 20:11         ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-09 22:31         ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-09 22:31           ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5615C3D6.3030005@samsung.com \
    --to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=amstan@chromium.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.