[PATCH v1 0/2] iser bounce buffering cleanup

[PATCH v1 0/2] iser bounce buffering cleanup

[Sagi Grimberg]

Now that the block layer reliably takes care that SG lists
won't contain gaps if a driver set a virt_boundary we can
lose the bounce buffering in iser code. The second patch
enables SG clustering as iser fully supports it.

This should be applied before the New memory registration
API patch set.

Changes from v0:
- Added Reviewed-by tags
- Fixed patch (1) title

Sagi Grimberg (2):
  iser: set block queue_virt_boundary
  IB/iser: Enable SG clustering

 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c     |  14 +-
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h     |   7 +-
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c |  51 +----
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c    | 274 ---------------------------
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 327 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary

[Sagi Grimberg]

By limiting the sg lists that we are allowing to meet
and 4k virtual boundary, we can completely remove the
entire bounce buffering logic.

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c     |  12 +-
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h     |   7 +-
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c |  51 +----
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c    | 274 ---------------------------
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 326 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
index f58ff96b6cbb..f559fe9e3baf 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
@@ -766,9 +766,7 @@ iscsi_iser_conn_get_stats(struct iscsi_cls_conn *cls_conn, struct iscsi_stats *s
 	stats->r2t_pdus = conn->r2t_pdus_cnt; /* always 0 */
 	stats->tmfcmd_pdus = conn->tmfcmd_pdus_cnt;
 	stats->tmfrsp_pdus = conn->tmfrsp_pdus_cnt;
-	stats->custom_length = 1;
-	strcpy(stats->custom[0].desc, "fmr_unalign_cnt");
-	stats->custom[0].value = conn->fmr_unalign_cnt;
+	stats->custom_length = 0;
 }
 
 static int iscsi_iser_get_ep_param(struct iscsi_endpoint *ep,
@@ -973,6 +971,13 @@ static umode_t iser_attr_is_visible(int param_type, int param)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int iscsi_iser_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+{
+	blk_queue_virt_boundary(sdev->request_queue, ~MASK_4K);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct scsi_host_template iscsi_iser_sht = {
 	.module                 = THIS_MODULE,
 	.name                   = "iSCSI Initiator over iSER",
@@ -986,6 +991,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template iscsi_iser_sht = {
 	.eh_target_reset_handler = iscsi_eh_recover_target,
 	.target_alloc		= iscsi_target_alloc,
 	.use_clustering         = DISABLE_CLUSTERING,
+	.slave_alloc            = iscsi_iser_slave_alloc,
 	.proc_name              = "iscsi_iser",
 	.this_id                = -1,
 	.track_queue_depth	= 1,
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
index 2fab519dbd86..2484bee993ec 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
@@ -227,18 +227,13 @@ enum iser_data_dir {
  * @size:         num entries of this sg
  * @data_len:     total beffer byte len
  * @dma_nents:    returned by dma_map_sg
- * @orig_sg:      pointer to the original sg list (in case
- *                we used a copy)
- * @orig_size:    num entris of orig sg list
  */
 struct iser_data_buf {
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	unsigned int       size;
 	unsigned long      data_len;
 	unsigned int       dma_nents;
-	struct scatterlist *orig_sg;
-	unsigned int       orig_size;
-  };
+};
 
 /* fwd declarations */
 struct iser_device;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c
index d511879d8cdf..ffd00c420729 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c
@@ -661,48 +661,14 @@ void iser_task_rdma_init(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task)
 
 void iser_task_rdma_finalize(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task)
 {
-	int is_rdma_data_aligned = 1;
-	int is_rdma_prot_aligned = 1;
 	int prot_count = scsi_prot_sg_count(iser_task->sc);
 
-	/* if we were reading, copy back to unaligned sglist,
-	 * anyway dma_unmap and free the copy
-	 */
-	if (iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_IN].orig_sg) {
-		is_rdma_data_aligned = 0;
-		iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg(iser_task,
-						&iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_IN],
-						ISER_DIR_IN);
-	}
-
-	if (iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_OUT].orig_sg) {
-		is_rdma_data_aligned = 0;
-		iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg(iser_task,
-						&iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_OUT],
-						ISER_DIR_OUT);
-	}
-
-	if (iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_IN].orig_sg) {
-		is_rdma_prot_aligned = 0;
-		iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg(iser_task,
-						&iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_IN],
-						ISER_DIR_IN);
-	}
-
-	if (iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_OUT].orig_sg) {
-		is_rdma_prot_aligned = 0;
-		iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg(iser_task,
-						&iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_OUT],
-						ISER_DIR_OUT);
-	}
-
 	if (iser_task->dir[ISER_DIR_IN]) {
 		iser_unreg_rdma_mem(iser_task, ISER_DIR_IN);
-		if (is_rdma_data_aligned)
-			iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
-						 &iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_IN],
-						 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-		if (prot_count && is_rdma_prot_aligned)
+		iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
+					 &iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_IN],
+					 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+		if (prot_count)
 			iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
 						 &iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_IN],
 						 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
@@ -710,11 +676,10 @@ void iser_task_rdma_finalize(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task)
 
 	if (iser_task->dir[ISER_DIR_OUT]) {
 		iser_unreg_rdma_mem(iser_task, ISER_DIR_OUT);
-		if (is_rdma_data_aligned)
-			iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
-						 &iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_OUT],
-						 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
-		if (prot_count && is_rdma_prot_aligned)
+		iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
+					 &iser_task->data[ISER_DIR_OUT],
+					 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+		if (prot_count)
 			iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task,
 						 &iser_task->prot[ISER_DIR_OUT],
 						 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
index f45e6a352173..b29fda3e8e74 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
@@ -88,113 +88,6 @@ int iser_assign_reg_ops(struct iser_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void
-iser_free_bounce_sg(struct iser_data_buf *data)
-{
-	struct scatterlist *sg;
-	int count;
-
-	for_each_sg(data->sg, sg, data->size, count)
-		__free_page(sg_page(sg));
-
-	kfree(data->sg);
-
-	data->sg = data->orig_sg;
-	data->size = data->orig_size;
-	data->orig_sg = NULL;
-	data->orig_size = 0;
-}
-
-static int
-iser_alloc_bounce_sg(struct iser_data_buf *data)
-{
-	struct scatterlist *sg;
-	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long length = data->data_len;
-	int i = 0, nents = DIV_ROUND_UP(length, PAGE_SIZE);
-
-	sg = kcalloc(nents, sizeof(*sg), GFP_ATOMIC);
-	if (!sg)
-		goto err;
-
-	sg_init_table(sg, nents);
-	while (length) {
-		u32 page_len = min_t(u32, length, PAGE_SIZE);
-
-		page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
-		if (!page)
-			goto err;
-
-		sg_set_page(&sg[i], page, page_len, 0);
-		length -= page_len;
-		i++;
-	}
-
-	data->orig_sg = data->sg;
-	data->orig_size = data->size;
-	data->sg = sg;
-	data->size = nents;
-
-	return 0;
-
-err:
-	for (; i > 0; i--)
-		__free_page(sg_page(&sg[i - 1]));
-	kfree(sg);
-
-	return -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static void
-iser_copy_bounce(struct iser_data_buf *data, bool to_buffer)
-{
-	struct scatterlist *osg, *bsg = data->sg;
-	void *oaddr, *baddr;
-	unsigned int left = data->data_len;
-	unsigned int bsg_off = 0;
-	int i;
-
-	for_each_sg(data->orig_sg, osg, data->orig_size, i) {
-		unsigned int copy_len, osg_off = 0;
-
-		oaddr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(osg)) + osg->offset;
-		copy_len = min(left, osg->length);
-		while (copy_len) {
-			unsigned int len = min(copy_len, bsg->length - bsg_off);
-
-			baddr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(bsg)) + bsg->offset;
-			if (to_buffer)
-				memcpy(baddr + bsg_off, oaddr + osg_off, len);
-			else
-				memcpy(oaddr + osg_off, baddr + bsg_off, len);
-
-			kunmap_atomic(baddr - bsg->offset);
-			osg_off += len;
-			bsg_off += len;
-			copy_len -= len;
-
-			if (bsg_off >= bsg->length) {
-				bsg = sg_next(bsg);
-				bsg_off = 0;
-			}
-		}
-		kunmap_atomic(oaddr - osg->offset);
-		left -= osg_off;
-	}
-}
-
-static inline void
-iser_copy_from_bounce(struct iser_data_buf *data)
-{
-	iser_copy_bounce(data, false);
-}
-
-static inline void
-iser_copy_to_bounce(struct iser_data_buf *data)
-{
-	iser_copy_bounce(data, true);
-}
-
 struct iser_fr_desc *
 iser_reg_desc_get_fr(struct ib_conn *ib_conn)
 {
@@ -238,62 +131,6 @@ iser_reg_desc_put_fmr(struct ib_conn *ib_conn,
 {
 }
 
-/**
- * iser_start_rdma_unaligned_sg
- */
-static int iser_start_rdma_unaligned_sg(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
-					struct iser_data_buf *data,
-					enum iser_data_dir cmd_dir)
-{
-	struct ib_device *dev = iser_task->iser_conn->ib_conn.device->ib_device;
-	int rc;
-
-	rc = iser_alloc_bounce_sg(data);
-	if (rc) {
-		iser_err("Failed to allocate bounce for data len %lu\n",
-			 data->data_len);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	if (cmd_dir == ISER_DIR_OUT)
-		iser_copy_to_bounce(data);
-
-	data->dma_nents = ib_dma_map_sg(dev, data->sg, data->size,
-					(cmd_dir == ISER_DIR_OUT) ?
-					DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-	if (!data->dma_nents) {
-		iser_err("Got dma_nents %d, something went wrong...\n",
-			 data->dma_nents);
-		rc = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-err:
-	iser_free_bounce_sg(data);
-	return rc;
-}
-
-/**
- * iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg
- */
-
-void iser_finalize_rdma_unaligned_sg(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
-				     struct iser_data_buf *data,
-				     enum iser_data_dir cmd_dir)
-{
-	struct ib_device *dev = iser_task->iser_conn->ib_conn.device->ib_device;
-
-	ib_dma_unmap_sg(dev, data->sg, data->size,
-			(cmd_dir == ISER_DIR_OUT) ?
-			DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-
-	if (cmd_dir == ISER_DIR_IN)
-		iser_copy_from_bounce(data);
-
-	iser_free_bounce_sg(data);
-}
-
 #define IS_4K_ALIGNED(addr)	((((unsigned long)addr) & ~MASK_4K) == 0)
 
 /**
@@ -355,64 +192,6 @@ static int iser_sg_to_page_vec(struct iser_data_buf *data,
 	return cur_page;
 }
 
-
-/**
- * iser_data_buf_aligned_len - Tries to determine the maximal correctly aligned
- * for RDMA sub-list of a scatter-gather list of memory buffers, and  returns
- * the number of entries which are aligned correctly. Supports the case where
- * consecutive SG elements are actually fragments of the same physcial page.
- */
-static int iser_data_buf_aligned_len(struct iser_data_buf *data,
-				     struct ib_device *ibdev,
-				     unsigned sg_tablesize)
-{
-	struct scatterlist *sg, *sgl, *next_sg = NULL;
-	u64 start_addr, end_addr;
-	int i, ret_len, start_check = 0;
-
-	if (data->dma_nents == 1)
-		return 1;
-
-	sgl = data->sg;
-	start_addr  = ib_sg_dma_address(ibdev, sgl);
-
-	if (unlikely(sgl[0].offset &&
-		     data->data_len >= sg_tablesize * PAGE_SIZE)) {
-		iser_dbg("can't register length %lx with offset %x "
-			 "fall to bounce buffer\n", data->data_len,
-			 sgl[0].offset);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, data->dma_nents, i) {
-		if (start_check && !IS_4K_ALIGNED(start_addr))
-			break;
-
-		next_sg = sg_next(sg);
-		if (!next_sg)
-			break;
-
-		end_addr    = start_addr + ib_sg_dma_len(ibdev, sg);
-		start_addr  = ib_sg_dma_address(ibdev, next_sg);
-
-		if (end_addr == start_addr) {
-			start_check = 0;
-			continue;
-		} else
-			start_check = 1;
-
-		if (!IS_4K_ALIGNED(end_addr))
-			break;
-	}
-	ret_len = (next_sg) ? i : i+1;
-
-	if (unlikely(ret_len != data->dma_nents))
-		iser_warn("rdma alignment violation (%d/%d aligned)\n",
-			  ret_len, data->dma_nents);
-
-	return ret_len;
-}
-
 static void iser_data_buf_dump(struct iser_data_buf *data,
 			       struct ib_device *ibdev)
 {
@@ -483,31 +262,6 @@ iser_reg_dma(struct iser_device *device, struct iser_data_buf *mem,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int fall_to_bounce_buf(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
-			      struct iser_data_buf *mem,
-			      enum iser_data_dir cmd_dir)
-{
-	struct iscsi_conn *iscsi_conn = iser_task->iser_conn->iscsi_conn;
-	struct iser_device *device = iser_task->iser_conn->ib_conn.device;
-
-	iscsi_conn->fmr_unalign_cnt++;
-
-	if (iser_debug_level > 0)
-		iser_data_buf_dump(mem, device->ib_device);
-
-	/* unmap the command data before accessing it */
-	iser_dma_unmap_task_data(iser_task, mem,
-				 (cmd_dir == ISER_DIR_OUT) ?
-				 DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-
-	/* allocate copy buf, if we are writing, copy the */
-	/* unaligned scatterlist, dma map the copy        */
-	if (iser_start_rdma_unaligned_sg(iser_task, mem, cmd_dir) != 0)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /**
  * iser_reg_page_vec - Register physical memory
  *
@@ -776,26 +530,6 @@ static int iser_fast_reg_mr(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
 }
 
 static int
-iser_handle_unaligned_buf(struct iscsi_iser_task *task,
-			  struct iser_data_buf *mem,
-			  enum iser_data_dir dir)
-{
-	struct iser_conn *iser_conn = task->iser_conn;
-	struct iser_device *device = iser_conn->ib_conn.device;
-	int err, aligned_len;
-
-	aligned_len = iser_data_buf_aligned_len(mem, device->ib_device,
-						iser_conn->scsi_sg_tablesize);
-	if (aligned_len != mem->dma_nents) {
-		err = fall_to_bounce_buf(task, mem, dir);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int
 iser_reg_prot_sg(struct iscsi_iser_task *task,
 		 struct iser_data_buf *mem,
 		 struct iser_fr_desc *desc,
@@ -837,10 +571,6 @@ int iser_reg_rdma_mem(struct iscsi_iser_task *task,
 	bool use_dma_key;
 	int err;
 
-	err = iser_handle_unaligned_buf(task, mem, dir);
-	if (unlikely(err))
-		return err;
-
 	use_dma_key = (mem->dma_nents == 1 && !iser_always_reg &&
 		       scsi_get_prot_op(task->sc) == SCSI_PROT_NORMAL);
 
@@ -863,10 +593,6 @@ int iser_reg_rdma_mem(struct iscsi_iser_task *task,
 
 		if (scsi_prot_sg_count(task->sc)) {
 			mem = &task->prot[dir];
-			err = iser_handle_unaligned_buf(task, mem, dir);
-			if (unlikely(err))
-				goto err_reg;
-
 			err = iser_reg_prot_sg(task, mem, desc,
 					       use_dma_key, prot_reg);
 			if (unlikely(err))
-- 
1.8.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary

[Or Gerlitz]

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> By limiting the sg lists that we are allowing to meet
> and 4k virtual boundary, we can completely remove the
> entire bounce buffering logic.

"limiting the sg lists that we are allowing to meet and 4k virtual boundary"

This "and" must be typo, right? please fix.

What happens now when an app wants to use 1K, 2K, 3K IOs? they can
only use 1/4, 1/2 or 3/4 of the available memory for these
transactions? and we are going to fix it with devices like mlx5 over
the new API you're proposing, right?

If this is the case, aren't we introducing a regression for
applications that used this IO pattern over devices which aren't
capable as mlx5 is (e.g mlx4), in the sense that the required memory
footprint to address the application IO demand can be made 4X bigger?

If the 4X assertion made here is correct, why not keeping the current
BB logic to come into play for such devices? I know that without the
BB code our driver looks much nicer and elegant, but life is sometimes
more complex... thoughts?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary

[Bart Van Assche]

On 10/11/15 12:04, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> If the 4X assertion made here is correct, why not keeping the current
> BB logic to come into play for such devices? I know that without the
> BB code our driver looks much nicer and elegant, but life is sometimes
> more complex... thoughts?

Hello Or,

Whether or not this 4x assertion is correct, logic like the bounce 
buffer mechanism that is removed by this patch series belongs in the 
block layer core and not in a SCSI LLD.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary

[Sagi Grimberg]

> What happens now when an app wants to use 1K, 2K, 3K IOs? they can
> only use 1/4, 1/2 or 3/4 of the available memory for these
> transactions?

What? I'm not sure what you are talking about. what available memory?

> and we are going to fix it with devices like mlx5 over
> the new API you're proposing, right?

Fix what?

>
> If this is the case, aren't we introducing a regression for
> applications that used this IO pattern over devices which aren't
> capable as mlx5 is (e.g mlx4), in the sense that the required memory
> footprint to address the application IO demand can be made 4X bigger?

Regression? What makes you think that the memory footprint increases?
There is no additional memory introduced by setting the queue
virt_boundary.

It's simple, like NVME prps, the RDMA page vectors need to meet:
- first byte offset
- full pages of some page_size
- last page can end before page_size

Not every SG list meets the above. Up until now we used BB. Since the
block layer is perfectly capable of handling this for us, we can lose
this bounce buffering code.

The block layer will:
- refuse merges if bios are not aligned to the virtual boundary
- split bios/requests that are not aligned to the virtual boundary
- or, bounce buffer SG_IOs that are not aligned to the virtual boundary

There is no additional memory what-so-ever.

With our arbitrary SG list support, If our device supports it, we can
remove the virt_boundary so the block layer won't have to take care of
any of the above.

>
> If the 4X assertion made here is correct

Its not.

> why not keeping the current
> BB logic to come into play for such devices? I know that without the
> BB code our driver looks much nicer and elegant, but life is sometimes
> more complex... thoughts?

Now that the block layer can absolutely guarantee to pass SG lists that
meet our alignment requirements, I don't think we need the BB logic
anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary

[Or Gerlitz]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:

>> What happens now when an app wants to use 1K, 2K, 3K IOs? they can
>> only use 1/4, 1/2 or 3/4 of the available memory for these
>> transactions?

> What? I'm not sure what you are talking about. what available memory?

Based on your comments, I'll take a look on the block layer changes and see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v1 2/2] IB/iser: Enable SG clustering

[Sagi Grimberg]

iser can handle it and it can dramatically reduce the
number of SG elements. It doesn't make much of a difference at
the moment, but with arbitrary SG list support it will benefit
greatly.

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
index f559fe9e3baf..8017f3a049fb 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template iscsi_iser_sht = {
 	.eh_device_reset_handler= iscsi_eh_device_reset,
 	.eh_target_reset_handler = iscsi_eh_recover_target,
 	.target_alloc		= iscsi_target_alloc,
-	.use_clustering         = DISABLE_CLUSTERING,
+	.use_clustering         = ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
 	.slave_alloc            = iscsi_iser_slave_alloc,
 	.proc_name              = "iscsi_iser",
 	.this_id                = -1,
-- 
1.8.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] IB/iser: Enable SG clustering

[Sagi Grimberg]

On 10/11/2015 6:35 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> iser can handle it and it can dramatically reduce the
> number of SG elements. It doesn't make much of a difference at
> the moment, but with arbitrary SG list support it will benefit
> greatly.
>

Bahh, I updated the change-log in the previous revision :(

Doug would you mind updating the change-log on the fly to:

iser can handle it and it can dramatically reduce the
number of SG elements. It doesn't make much of a difference at
the moment, but with arbitrary SG list support it will benefit
greatly as it would reduce the size of the HW descriptors array.

Thanks and sorry...

Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] IB/iser: Enable SG clustering

[Or Gerlitz]

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 6:35 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>
>> iser can handle it and it can dramatically reduce the
>> number of SG elements. It doesn't make much of a difference at
>> the moment, but with arbitrary SG list support it will benefit
>> greatly.
>>
>
> Bahh, I updated the change-log in the previous revision :(
>
> Doug would you mind updating the change-log on the fly to:

Doug,  I sent Sagi a note asking to improve the change-log, lets get
this done prior to picking the patch.

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html