From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to store the target vCPU in the rank
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:28:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561B9974.7060504@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510121205530.1179@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On 12/10/15 12:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 12/10/15 11:41, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>>> If the concern is the behavior is changed, I'm happy to rework this code
>>>>> to keep exactly the same behavior. I.e any 32-bit write containing
>>>>> a 0 byte will be ignored. This is not optimal but at least I'm not
>>>>> opening the pandora box of fixing every single error in the code touch
>>>>> by this series.
>>>>
>>>> I'm okay with the new behaviour, I think Stefano was willing to tolerate it
>>>> (based on <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510081220190.1179@kaball.uk.xensource.com>).
>>>>
>>>> So if we aren't going to fix it to DTRT WRT writing zero to a target then I
>>>> think we can go with the current variant and not change to ignoring any
>>>> word with a zero byte in it.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> BTW it would be interesting to see how real hardware behaves in this
>>> regard. I seem to recall that X-Gene was ignoring 0 writes too.
>>
>> What do you mean by 0 writes? Is it the write ignored if one byte is 0?
>
> Yes, for either 32bit or 8bit writes.
I just gave a try on X-gene and any write is store even if it contains
a 0 byte:
(XEN) ITARGET56 = 0x1010101
(XEN) w 0x2020200 r 0x2020200
(XEN) w 0x4040004 r 0x4040004
(XEN) w 0x8000808 r 0x8000808
(XEN) w 0x101010 r 0x101010
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
index 5841e59..743c9eb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
@@ -279,6 +279,32 @@ static void __init gicv2_dist_init(void)
for ( i = 32; i < nr_lines; i += 4 )
writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4);
+ for ( i = 32; i < nr_lines; i += 4 )
+ {
+ int n = i / 4;
+ int j = 0;
+ unsigned int reg = GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4;
+
+ printk("ITARGET%u = 0x%x\n", n, readl_gicd(reg));
+
+ for ( j = 0; j < 4; j++ )
+ {
+ uint32_t tmp = 1 << (j + 1);
+
+ tmp |= tmp << 8;
+ tmp |= tmp << 16;
+
+ /* Mask the field j */
+ tmp &= ~((0xff) << (j * 8));
+
+ writel_gicd(tmp, reg);
+
+ printk("\t w 0x%x r 0x%x\n", tmp, readl_gicd(reg));
+ }
+ }
+
+ while (1);
+
/* Default priority for global interrupts */
for ( i = 32; i < nr_lines; i += 4 )
writel_gicd(GIC_PRI_IRQ << 24 | GIC_PRI_IRQ << 16 |
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 14:41 [PATCH v3 0/9] xen/arm: vgic: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit register Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xen/arm: io: remove mmio_check_t typedef Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xen/arm: io: Extend write/read handler to pass the register in parameter Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xen/arm: io: Support sign-extension for every read access Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xen/arm: vgic: ctlr stores a 32-bit hardware register so use uint32_t Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to store GICD_IPRIORITYR in the rank Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xen/arm: vgic: Introduce a new field to store the rank index and use it Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to store the target vCPU in the rank Julien Grall
2015-10-07 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-07 16:00 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-07 16:29 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-07 19:13 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-08 9:39 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-08 10:43 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-07 17:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-07 18:16 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-08 10:56 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-08 11:36 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-08 12:23 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-08 12:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-08 13:46 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-08 14:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-08 18:36 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-09 11:24 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-09 11:38 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-12 10:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-12 11:00 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-12 11:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-12 11:28 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/arm: vgic: Introduce helpers to extract/update/clear/set vGIC register Julien Grall
2015-10-07 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xen/arm: vgic-v3: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit registers Julien Grall
2015-10-08 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xen/arm: vgic: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit register Julien Grall
2015-10-08 11:46 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561B9974.7060504@citrix.com \
--to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.