rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.4

rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.4

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 523 bytes --]

Hi Yehuda,

The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58). 
Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?

Cheers

P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you need more context about one of them.

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


















[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.4

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]

Hi,

After todays private discussion and the merge of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6161, I will assume the current hammer branch (7f485ed5aa620fe982561663bf64356b7e2c38f2) is ready for QE to start their own round of testing. If I misinterpreted what you wrote, please speak up and I'll do what's needed ;-)

Cheers

On 02/10/2015 22:31, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
> 
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58). 
> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you need more context about one of them.
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.4

[Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub]

Yeah, it should be fine.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After todays private discussion and the merge of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6161, I will assume the current hammer branch (7f485ed5aa620fe982561663bf64356b7e2c38f2) is ready for QE to start their own round of testing. If I misinterpreted what you wrote, please speak up and I'll do what's needed ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> On 02/10/2015 22:31, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58).
>> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you need more context about one of them.
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html