From: m-karicheri2@ti.com (Murali Karicheri)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss: enable accumulator queue support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D2DE9.4080809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561D2AE0.6090406@oracle.com>
Santosh,
On 10/13/2015 12:01 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 6:56 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 03:46 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>> This patch series enable accumulator queue support for K2 SoCs.
>
>> Santosh, Arnd,
>>
>> Could you please review and let me know if there is any comment. If
>> looks good, could you please merge to v4.4 next branch?
>>
> Please report the series updating the comments from Arnd. Also split
> the series into drivers and dts updates.
The cover letter already summarize this as a comment against v1 even
though it didn't mention Arnd's name. Is it usual to describe the
reviewers name in the change log? I thought we just describe the comment
addressed, not who has commented. Not??
About splitting the series, it was done so since both is being pulled by
you. If needed, I can do the split. Let me know.
Murali
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
>
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
To: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, ssantosh@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss: enable accumulator queue support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D2DE9.4080809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561D2AE0.6090406@oracle.com>
Santosh,
On 10/13/2015 12:01 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 6:56 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 03:46 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>> This patch series enable accumulator queue support for K2 SoCs.
>
>> Santosh, Arnd,
>>
>> Could you please review and let me know if there is any comment. If
>> looks good, could you please merge to v4.4 next branch?
>>
> Please report the series updating the comments from Arnd. Also split
> the series into drivers and dts updates.
The cover letter already summarize this as a comment against v1 even
though it didn't mention Arnd's name. Is it usual to describe the
reviewers name in the change log? I thought we just describe the comment
addressed, not who has commented. Not??
About splitting the series, it was done so since both is being pulled by
you. If needed, I can do the split. Let me know.
Murali
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
>
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
To: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
<corbet@lwn.net>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<pawel.moll@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss: enable accumulator queue support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D2DE9.4080809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561D2AE0.6090406@oracle.com>
Santosh,
On 10/13/2015 12:01 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 6:56 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 03:46 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>> This patch series enable accumulator queue support for K2 SoCs.
>
>> Santosh, Arnd,
>>
>> Could you please review and let me know if there is any comment. If
>> looks good, could you please merge to v4.4 next branch?
>>
> Please report the series updating the comments from Arnd. Also split
> the series into drivers and dts updates.
The cover letter already summarize this as a comment against v1 even
though it didn't mention Arnd's name. Is it usual to describe the
reviewers name in the change log? I thought we just describe the comment
addressed, not who has commented. Not??
About splitting the series, it was done so since both is being pulled by
you. If needed, I can do the split. Let me know.
Murali
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
>
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 19:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss: enable accumulator queue support Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: dt: soc: move driver description to a separate document Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 14:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-13 14:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-13 15:44 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 15:44 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 17:28 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 17:28 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 17:28 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 18:01 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-13 18:01 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-13 18:21 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 18:21 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] soc: ti: add firmware file name as part of the driver Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 14:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-13 14:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-13 14:38 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: keystone: enable accumulator channels Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] soc: ti: qmss: make acc queue support optional in the driver Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:46 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss: enable accumulator queue support Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:54 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-12 19:54 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 13:56 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 13:56 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 13:56 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 16:01 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-10-13 16:01 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-10-13 16:14 ` Murali Karicheri [this message]
2015-10-13 16:14 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 16:14 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 16:21 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-10-13 16:21 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-10-13 16:42 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 16:42 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-13 16:42 ` Murali Karicheri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561D2DE9.4080809@ti.com \
--to=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.