All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: Add STM32 DMA driver
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:29:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E58AC.80207@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOAejn2pcFSn3Hf=j6zgg6Ui6GjJZrtRch6ywByHaVLsTLMk6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 14/10/15 14:17, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct stm32_dma_device *dmadev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
>>>> +
>>>> +       dma_async_device_unregister(&dmadev->ddev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       clk_disable_unprepare(dmadev->clk);
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the purpose of disabling/unpreparing the clock here?
>>> stm32_dma_alloc_chan_resources() and stm32_dma_free_chan_resources() should
>>> pair up and the clock should already be stopped.
>
> stm32_dma_remove() could be called during an on-going transfer during
> module unload.
> So in that case, it seems that disabling/unpreparing the clock is needed.

Really?

I think we need to be sure any on-going transfers are stopped.

There are multiple reasons for this, not least the risk of executing a 
callback that has been freed, but the one related to my point is that a 
single clk_disable_unprepare() will remain broken because if you don't 
know that the transfers have stopped then you don't know how many 
on-going transfers there are.


Daniel.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: M'boumba Cedric Madianga
	<cedric.madianga-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
	<mcoquelin.stm32-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
	Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: Add STM32 DMA driver
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:29:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E58AC.80207@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOAejn2pcFSn3Hf=j6zgg6Ui6GjJZrtRch6ywByHaVLsTLMk6A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 14/10/15 14:17, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct stm32_dma_device *dmadev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
>>>> +
>>>> +       dma_async_device_unregister(&dmadev->ddev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       clk_disable_unprepare(dmadev->clk);
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the purpose of disabling/unpreparing the clock here?
>>> stm32_dma_alloc_chan_resources() and stm32_dma_free_chan_resources() should
>>> pair up and the clock should already be stopped.
>
> stm32_dma_remove() could be called during an on-going transfer during
> module unload.
> So in that case, it seems that disabling/unpreparing the clock is needed.

Really?

I think we need to be sure any on-going transfers are stopped.

There are multiple reasons for this, not least the risk of executing a 
callback that has been freed, but the one related to my point is that a 
single clk_disable_unprepare() will remain broken because if you don't 
know that the transfers have stopped then you don't know how many 
on-going transfers there are.


Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: Add STM32 DMA driver
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:29:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E58AC.80207@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOAejn2pcFSn3Hf=j6zgg6Ui6GjJZrtRch6ywByHaVLsTLMk6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 14/10/15 14:17, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct stm32_dma_device *dmadev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
>>>> +
>>>> +       dma_async_device_unregister(&dmadev->ddev);
>>>> +
>>>> +       clk_disable_unprepare(dmadev->clk);
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the purpose of disabling/unpreparing the clock here?
>>> stm32_dma_alloc_chan_resources() and stm32_dma_free_chan_resources() should
>>> pair up and the clock should already be stopped.
>
> stm32_dma_remove() could be called during an on-going transfer during
> module unload.
> So in that case, it seems that disabling/unpreparing the clock is needed.

Really?

I think we need to be sure any on-going transfers are stopped.

There are multiple reasons for this, not least the risk of executing a 
callback that has been freed, but the one related to my point is that a 
single clk_disable_unprepare() will remain broken because if you don't 
know that the transfers have stopped then you don't know how many 
on-going transfers there are.


Daniel.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-13 14:05 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for STM32 DMA M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05 ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: Document the STM32 DMA bindings M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  8:54   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  8:54     ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: Add STM32 DMA driver M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:34   ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-13 14:34     ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-13 14:34     ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14  7:54     ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  7:54       ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  7:54       ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  8:52       ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14  8:52         ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14  8:57         ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  8:57           ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14  8:57           ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 13:17       ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 13:17         ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 13:29         ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2015-10-14 13:29           ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 13:29           ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 13:41           ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 13:41             ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 14:24             ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 14:24               ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 15:26               ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 15:26                 ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 15:26                 ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 15:28                 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 15:28                   ` Daniel Thompson
2015-10-14 15:41                   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 15:41                     ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 15:41                     ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-15  4:07                     ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-15  4:07                       ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-15  4:07                       ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 11:16   ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 11:16     ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 11:16     ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 13:07     ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 13:07       ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-14 14:14       ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 14:14         ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-14 14:14         ` Vinod Koul
2015-10-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: Add STM32 DMA support for STM32F429 MCU M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: configs: Add STM32 DMA support in STM32 defconfig M'boumba Cedric Madianga
2015-10-13 14:05   ` M'boumba Cedric Madianga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561E58AC.80207@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.