From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] arm64: KVM: Add panic handling
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:26:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5649E7A0.3050109@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116141629.GH20696@leverpostej>
On 16/11/15 14:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> index 06d3e20..cdc2a96 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> @@ -140,3 +140,38 @@ int __hyp_text __guest_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> return exit_code;
>> }
>> +
>> +static const char *__hyp_panic_string = "HYP panic:\nPS:%08x PC:%p ESR:%p\nFAR:%p HPFAR:%p PAR:%p\nVCPU:%p\n";
>
> I assume that if [1] goes in we'll update this to match.
Definitely.
>> +
>> +void __hyp_text __noreturn __hyp_panic(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 spsr = read_sysreg(spsr_el2);
>> + u64 elr = read_sysreg(elr_el2);
>> + u64 par = read_sysreg(par_el1);
>> +
>> + if (read_sysreg(vttbr_el2)) {
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
>> +
>> + vcpu = (struct kvm_vcpu *)read_sysreg(tpidr_el2);
>> + host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
>> + __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
>> + __deactivate_vm(vcpu);
>> + __sysreg_restore_state(host_ctxt);
>> +
>> + write_sysreg(host_ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1, sp_el1);
>
> __sysreg_restore_state restores the host sp_el1, no?
Better safe than sorry! ;-) Looks like a leftover from some ancient
version... I'll fix that.
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Call panic for real */
>> + while (1) {
>> + unsigned long str_va = (unsigned long)__hyp_panic_string;
>> +
>> + str_va -= HYP_PAGE_OFFSET;
>> + str_va += PAGE_OFFSET;
>> + __hyp_do_panic(str_va,
>> + spsr, elr,
>> + read_sysreg(esr_el2), read_sysreg(far_el2),
>> + read_sysreg(hpfar_el2), par,
>> + read_sysreg(tpidr_el2));
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I think the while (1) here is confusing.
>
> Can we not jsut declare str_va at the start of the function and get rid
> of the loop?
The while(1) is to prevent GCC from screaming (it otherwise believes
that the function actually returns, despite the __noreturn attribute).
Or were you thinking of something else?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 15/21] arm64: KVM: Add panic handling
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:26:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5649E7A0.3050109@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116141629.GH20696@leverpostej>
On 16/11/15 14:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> index 06d3e20..cdc2a96 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> @@ -140,3 +140,38 @@ int __hyp_text __guest_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> return exit_code;
>> }
>> +
>> +static const char *__hyp_panic_string = "HYP panic:\nPS:%08x PC:%p ESR:%p\nFAR:%p HPFAR:%p PAR:%p\nVCPU:%p\n";
>
> I assume that if [1] goes in we'll update this to match.
Definitely.
>> +
>> +void __hyp_text __noreturn __hyp_panic(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 spsr = read_sysreg(spsr_el2);
>> + u64 elr = read_sysreg(elr_el2);
>> + u64 par = read_sysreg(par_el1);
>> +
>> + if (read_sysreg(vttbr_el2)) {
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
>> +
>> + vcpu = (struct kvm_vcpu *)read_sysreg(tpidr_el2);
>> + host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
>> + __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
>> + __deactivate_vm(vcpu);
>> + __sysreg_restore_state(host_ctxt);
>> +
>> + write_sysreg(host_ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1, sp_el1);
>
> __sysreg_restore_state restores the host sp_el1, no?
Better safe than sorry! ;-) Looks like a leftover from some ancient
version... I'll fix that.
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Call panic for real */
>> + while (1) {
>> + unsigned long str_va = (unsigned long)__hyp_panic_string;
>> +
>> + str_va -= HYP_PAGE_OFFSET;
>> + str_va += PAGE_OFFSET;
>> + __hyp_do_panic(str_va,
>> + spsr, elr,
>> + read_sysreg(esr_el2), read_sysreg(far_el2),
>> + read_sysreg(hpfar_el2), par,
>> + read_sysreg(tpidr_el2));
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I think the while (1) here is confusing.
>
> Can we not jsut declare str_va at the start of the function and get rid
> of the loop?
The while(1) is to prevent GCC from screaming (it otherwise believes
that the function actually returns, despite the __noreturn attribute).
Or were you thinking of something else?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 13:11 [PATCH 00/21] arm64: KVM: world switch in C Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/21] arm64: add macros to read/write system registers Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/21] arm64: KVM: Add a HYP-specific header file Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/21] arm64: KVM: Implement vgic-v2 save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-20 15:22 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-20 15:22 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-20 15:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-20 15:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/21] arm64: KVM: Implement vgic-v3 save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-20 16:48 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-20 16:48 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-20 17:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-20 17:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/21] arm64: KVM: Implement timer save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-23 10:47 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-23 10:47 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-25 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-25 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-25 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 06/21] arm64: KVM: Implement system register save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/21] arm64: KVM: Implement 32bit " Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/21] arm64: KVM: Implement debug save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/21] arm64: KVM: Implement guest entry Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 10/21] arm64: KVM: Add patchable function selector Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/21] arm64: KVM: Implement the core world switch Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-24 17:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-11-24 17:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-11-24 17:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-24 17:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-24 17:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 12/21] arm64: KVM: Implement fpsimd save/restore Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 11:13 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-17 11:13 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-17 11:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 11:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 11:49 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-17 11:49 ` Steve Capper
2015-11-17 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 13/21] arm64: KVM: Implement TLB handling Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 14/21] arm64: KVM: HYP mode entry points Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 15/21] arm64: KVM: Add panic handling Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-11-16 14:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 15:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 15:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 16/21] arm64: KVM: Add compatibility aliases Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 17/21] arm64: KVM: Map the kernel RO section into HYP Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-16 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 18/21] arm64: KVM: Move away from the assembly version of the world switch Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 19/21] arm64: KVM: Turn system register numbers to an enum Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 20/21] arm64: KVM: Cleanup asm-offset.c Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` [PATCH 21/21] arm64: KVM: Remove weak attributes Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5649E7A0.3050109@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.