From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] phy-sun4i-usb: Use of_match_node to get model specific config data
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:11:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5656F6F4.1040801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v64XL=bptxoCwiVkf8u-EfckpuASS3Foo=Q3i4a_6CaJYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 26-11-15 05:22, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Use of_match_node instead of calling of_device_is_compatible a ton of
>> times to get model specific config data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> -New patch in v3 of this patch-set
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> index b12964b..1d8f85d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> @@ -88,12 +88,22 @@
>> #define DEBOUNCE_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(50)
>> #define POLL_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(250)
>>
>> +enum sun4i_usb_phy_type {
>> + sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + sun8i_a33_phy,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg {
>> + int num_phys;
>> + u32 disc_thresh;
>> + enum sun4i_usb_phy_type type;
>> + bool dedicated_clocks;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy_data {
>> void __iomem *base;
>> + const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg *cfg;
>> struct mutex mutex;
>> - int num_phys;
>> - u32 disc_thresh;
>> - bool has_a33_phyctl;
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy {
>> struct phy *phy;
>> void __iomem *pmu;
>> @@ -164,12 +174,15 @@ static void sun4i_usb_phy_write(struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy, u32 addr, u32 data,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&phy_data->mutex);
>>
>> - if (phy_data->has_a33_phyctl) {
>> + switch (phy_data->cfg->type) {
>> + case sun4i_a10_phy:
>> + phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A10;
>
> Any reason why this offset isn't incorporated into phy_data?
You mean in phy_data->cfg I assume, the difference needed for
the "sun4i_usb_phy_write" functionality are not just the phyctl
register offset...
>
>> + break;
>> + case sun8i_a33_phy:
>> phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A33;
>> /* A33 needs us to set phyctl to 0 explicitly */
>> writel(0, phyctl);
e.g. the A33 needs this extra write, and on the H3 we need to do
similar bitbanging, but slightly different, see:
https://github.com/allwinner-zh/linux-3.4-sunxi/blob/master/drivers/usb/host/sunxi_hci.c#L899
Notice how it uses different addr and write register addresses
their through the usb_phy_csr_add and usb_phy_csr_write helper
functions as well as directly poking offset 0x20.
My current H3 usb-phy support patches do not deal with this,
as the h3 sdk code posted by the orange-pi people never calls
this function, so we do not need to worry about implementing
sun4i_usb_phy_write for H3, but if we ever want to tweak
lowlevel phy settings, and/or for the A83 we likely need to
implement a whole different sun4i_usb_phy_write code-path for
the H3/A83.
So it seems better to just have phy_data->cfg->type and deal
with any SoC specific differences on that, as there are more
differences to deal with then just the phyctl register offset.
Regards,
Hans
>> - } else {
>> - phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A10;
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> @@ -249,7 +262,8 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_init(struct phy *_phy)
>> sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_TX_AMPLITUDE_TUNE, 0x14, 5);
>>
>> /* Disconnect threshold adjustment */
>> - sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_DISCON_TH_SEL, data->disc_thresh, 2);
>> + sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_DISCON_TH_SEL,
>> + data->cfg->disc_thresh, 2);
>>
>> sun4i_usb_phy_passby(phy, 1);
>>
>> @@ -476,7 +490,7 @@ static struct phy *sun4i_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
>> {
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>
>> - if (args->args[0] >= data->num_phys)
>> + if (args->args[0] >= data->cfg->num_phys)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> return data->phys[args->args[0]].phy;
>> @@ -499,6 +513,59 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun4i_a10_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun5i_a13_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 2,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun6i_a31_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun7i_a20_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 2,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun8i_a23_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun8i_a33_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun8i_a33_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-phy", .data = &sun4i_a10_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy", .data = &sun5i_a13_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy", .data = &sun6i_a31_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy", .data = &sun7i_a20_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a23_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a33_cfg },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_usb_phy_of_match);
>> +
>> static const unsigned int sun4i_usb_phy0_cable[] = {
>> EXTCON_USB,
>> EXTCON_USB_HOST,
>> @@ -511,10 +578,16 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>> - bool dedicated_clocks;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> struct resource *res;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> + match = of_match_node(sun4i_usb_phy_of_match, dev->of_node);
>
> You can use of_device_get_match_data() for slightly less code. This
> will also let you keep the of_device_id table where it was, at the
> bottom.
>
>> + if (!match) {
>
> I'm working on something similar in the axp20x driver. Is there any
> case of_match_node or of_device_get_match_data can fail?
>
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
>> + dev_err(dev, "of_match_node() failed\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -522,29 +595,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> mutex_init(&data->mutex);
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&data->detect, sun4i_usb_phy0_id_vbus_det_scan);
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, data);
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - data->num_phys = 2;
>> - else
>> - data->num_phys = 3;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy"))
>> - data->disc_thresh = 2;
>> - else
>> - data->disc_thresh = 3;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - dedicated_clocks = true;
>> - else
>> - dedicated_clocks = false;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - data->has_a33_phyctl = true;
>> + data->cfg = match->data;
>>
>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "phy_ctrl");
>> data->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> @@ -590,7 +641,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < data->num_phys; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < data->cfg->num_phys; i++) {
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy = data->phys + i;
>> char name[16];
>>
>> @@ -602,7 +653,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> phy->vbus = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (dedicated_clocks)
>> + if (data->cfg->dedicated_clocks)
>> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "usb%d_phy", i);
>> else
>> strlcpy(name, "usb_phy", sizeof(name));
>> @@ -689,17 +740,6 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy" },
>> - { },
>> -};
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_usb_phy_of_match);
>> -
>> static struct platform_driver sun4i_usb_phy_driver = {
>> .probe = sun4i_usb_phy_probe,
>> .remove = sun4i_usb_phy_remove,
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
"Reinder E.N. de Haan"
<reinder-I1/eAgTnXDYAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] phy-sun4i-usb: Use of_match_node to get model specific config data
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:11:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5656F6F4.1040801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v64XL=bptxoCwiVkf8u-EfckpuASS3Foo=Q3i4a_6CaJYA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 26-11-15 05:22, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Use of_match_node instead of calling of_device_is_compatible a ton of
>> times to get model specific config data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> -New patch in v3 of this patch-set
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> index b12964b..1d8f85d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
>> @@ -88,12 +88,22 @@
>> #define DEBOUNCE_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(50)
>> #define POLL_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(250)
>>
>> +enum sun4i_usb_phy_type {
>> + sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + sun8i_a33_phy,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg {
>> + int num_phys;
>> + u32 disc_thresh;
>> + enum sun4i_usb_phy_type type;
>> + bool dedicated_clocks;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy_data {
>> void __iomem *base;
>> + const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg *cfg;
>> struct mutex mutex;
>> - int num_phys;
>> - u32 disc_thresh;
>> - bool has_a33_phyctl;
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy {
>> struct phy *phy;
>> void __iomem *pmu;
>> @@ -164,12 +174,15 @@ static void sun4i_usb_phy_write(struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy, u32 addr, u32 data,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&phy_data->mutex);
>>
>> - if (phy_data->has_a33_phyctl) {
>> + switch (phy_data->cfg->type) {
>> + case sun4i_a10_phy:
>> + phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A10;
>
> Any reason why this offset isn't incorporated into phy_data?
You mean in phy_data->cfg I assume, the difference needed for
the "sun4i_usb_phy_write" functionality are not just the phyctl
register offset...
>
>> + break;
>> + case sun8i_a33_phy:
>> phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A33;
>> /* A33 needs us to set phyctl to 0 explicitly */
>> writel(0, phyctl);
e.g. the A33 needs this extra write, and on the H3 we need to do
similar bitbanging, but slightly different, see:
https://github.com/allwinner-zh/linux-3.4-sunxi/blob/master/drivers/usb/host/sunxi_hci.c#L899
Notice how it uses different addr and write register addresses
their through the usb_phy_csr_add and usb_phy_csr_write helper
functions as well as directly poking offset 0x20.
My current H3 usb-phy support patches do not deal with this,
as the h3 sdk code posted by the orange-pi people never calls
this function, so we do not need to worry about implementing
sun4i_usb_phy_write for H3, but if we ever want to tweak
lowlevel phy settings, and/or for the A83 we likely need to
implement a whole different sun4i_usb_phy_write code-path for
the H3/A83.
So it seems better to just have phy_data->cfg->type and deal
with any SoC specific differences on that, as there are more
differences to deal with then just the phyctl register offset.
Regards,
Hans
>> - } else {
>> - phyctl = phy_data->base + REG_PHYCTL_A10;
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> @@ -249,7 +262,8 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_init(struct phy *_phy)
>> sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_TX_AMPLITUDE_TUNE, 0x14, 5);
>>
>> /* Disconnect threshold adjustment */
>> - sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_DISCON_TH_SEL, data->disc_thresh, 2);
>> + sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_DISCON_TH_SEL,
>> + data->cfg->disc_thresh, 2);
>>
>> sun4i_usb_phy_passby(phy, 1);
>>
>> @@ -476,7 +490,7 @@ static struct phy *sun4i_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
>> {
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>
>> - if (args->args[0] >= data->num_phys)
>> + if (args->args[0] >= data->cfg->num_phys)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> return data->phys[args->args[0]].phy;
>> @@ -499,6 +513,59 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun4i_a10_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun5i_a13_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 2,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun6i_a31_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun7i_a20_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 3,
>> + .disc_thresh = 2,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun8i_a23_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun4i_a10_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun8i_a33_cfg = {
>> + .num_phys = 2,
>> + .disc_thresh = 3,
>> + .type = sun8i_a33_phy,
>> + .dedicated_clocks = true,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-phy", .data = &sun4i_a10_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy", .data = &sun5i_a13_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy", .data = &sun6i_a31_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy", .data = &sun7i_a20_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a23_cfg },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a33_cfg },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_usb_phy_of_match);
>> +
>> static const unsigned int sun4i_usb_phy0_cable[] = {
>> EXTCON_USB,
>> EXTCON_USB_HOST,
>> @@ -511,10 +578,16 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>> - bool dedicated_clocks;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> struct resource *res;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> + match = of_match_node(sun4i_usb_phy_of_match, dev->of_node);
>
> You can use of_device_get_match_data() for slightly less code. This
> will also let you keep the of_device_id table where it was, at the
> bottom.
>
>> + if (!match) {
>
> I'm working on something similar in the axp20x driver. Is there any
> case of_match_node or of_device_get_match_data can fail?
>
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
>> + dev_err(dev, "of_match_node() failed\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -522,29 +595,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> mutex_init(&data->mutex);
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&data->detect, sun4i_usb_phy0_id_vbus_det_scan);
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, data);
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - data->num_phys = 2;
>> - else
>> - data->num_phys = 3;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy"))
>> - data->disc_thresh = 2;
>> - else
>> - data->disc_thresh = 3;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy") ||
>> - of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - dedicated_clocks = true;
>> - else
>> - dedicated_clocks = false;
>> -
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy"))
>> - data->has_a33_phyctl = true;
>> + data->cfg = match->data;
>>
>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "phy_ctrl");
>> data->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> @@ -590,7 +641,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < data->num_phys; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < data->cfg->num_phys; i++) {
>> struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy = data->phys + i;
>> char name[16];
>>
>> @@ -602,7 +653,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> phy->vbus = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (dedicated_clocks)
>> + if (data->cfg->dedicated_clocks)
>> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "usb%d_phy", i);
>> else
>> strlcpy(name, "usb_phy", sizeof(name));
>> @@ -689,17 +740,6 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy" },
>> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy" },
>> - { },
>> -};
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_usb_phy_of_match);
>> -
>> static struct platform_driver sun4i_usb_phy_driver = {
>> .probe = sun4i_usb_phy_probe,
>> .remove = sun4i_usb_phy_remove,
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 16:50 [PATCH v3 1/2] phy-sun4i-usb: Use of_match_node to get model specific config data Hans de Goede
2015-11-25 16:50 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-25 16:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for the host usb-phys found on the H3 SoC Hans de Goede
2015-11-25 16:50 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-25 22:11 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-25 22:11 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-26 12:03 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-11-26 12:03 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-01 15:56 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2015-12-01 15:56 ` Priit Laes
2015-11-26 4:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] phy-sun4i-usb: Use of_match_node to get model specific config data Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-11-26 4:22 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-11-26 7:14 ` [linux-sunxi] " LABBE Corentin
2015-11-26 7:14 ` LABBE Corentin
2015-11-26 12:11 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-11-26 12:11 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-11-27 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-11-27 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-11-27 10:37 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-27 10:37 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-27 10:41 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-27 10:41 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5656F6F4.1040801@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.